From: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
To: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@gmail.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH] qdisc: validate frames going through the direct_xmit path
Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2014 16:26:28 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140903162628.3d05f113@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140903155213.62ff4eff@redhat.com>
On Wed, 3 Sep 2014 15:52:13 +0200
Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 03 Sep 2014 06:43:25 -0700
> Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >
> > Jesper, you missed another spot, when there is no qdisc on the device.
> >
> > __dev_queue_xmit() calls dev_hard_start_xmit() around line 2886
> >
> > Could we try to not add a myriad of small patches ?
> >
> > Some of us will need to backport all of them.
>
> I'm in the same backport situation ;-)
>
> I'll send a V2 of this patch, with missed spot...
(to avoid doing too many patches)
In the code below (from __dev_queue_xmit()), I've added validate_xmit_skb().
(dev_hard_start_xmit() can handle if it is a NULL ptr)
HARD_TX_LOCK(dev, txq, cpu);
if (!netif_xmit_stopped(txq)) {
skb = validate_xmit_skb(skb, dev);
__this_cpu_inc(xmit_recursion);
skb = dev_hard_start_xmit(skb, dev, txq, &rc);
__this_cpu_dec(xmit_recursion);
if (dev_xmit_complete(rc)) {
HARD_TX_UNLOCK(dev, txq);
goto out;
}
}
HARD_TX_UNLOCK(dev, txq);
net_crit_ratelimited("Virtual device %s asks to queue packet!\n",
dev->name);
BUT shouldn't we also handle if dev_hard_start_xmit() returns an skb pointer,
which means that there were skb's left on the skb list. Due to the rc
value "returned" in this case, we should see the net_crit_ratelimited()
msg, but we don't handle freeing these SKBs.
Any recommentations?
--
Best regards,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer
MSc.CS, Sr. Network Kernel Developer at Red Hat
Author of http://www.iptv-analyzer.org
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/brouer
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-09-03 14:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-09-02 22:55 [PATCH] net: Validate frames going through the direct_xmit path Alexander Duyck
2014-09-02 23:30 ` Eric Dumazet
2014-09-03 2:46 ` Alexander Duyck
2014-09-03 4:23 ` Eric Dumazet
2014-09-03 11:57 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2014-09-03 11:48 ` [net-next PATCH] qdisc: validate " Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2014-09-03 13:43 ` Eric Dumazet
2014-09-03 13:52 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2014-09-03 14:26 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer [this message]
2014-09-03 15:22 ` Eric Dumazet
2014-09-03 15:24 ` [net-next PATCH V2] " Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2014-09-03 15:56 ` [net-next PATCH V3] " Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2014-09-03 16:08 ` Eric Dumazet
2014-09-03 16:17 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2014-09-04 3:43 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140903162628.3d05f113@redhat.com \
--to=brouer@redhat.com \
--cc=alexander.duyck@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).