From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Graf Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v5] lib/rhashtable: allow user to set the minimum shifts of shrinking Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2014 18:18:52 +0100 Message-ID: <20140903171852.GA31628@casper.infradead.org> References: <1409707356-3795-1-git-send-email-ying.xue@windriver.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: Ying Xue Return-path: Received: from casper.infradead.org ([85.118.1.10]:41265 "EHLO casper.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932670AbaICRSy (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Sep 2014 13:18:54 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1409707356-3795-1-git-send-email-ying.xue@windriver.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 09/03/14 at 09:22am, Ying Xue wrote: > Although rhashtable library allows user to specify a quiet big size > for user's created hash table, the table may be shrunk to a > very small size - HASH_MIN_SIZE(4) after object is removed from > the table at the first time. Subsequently, even if the total amount > of objects saved in the table is quite lower than user's initial > setting in a long time, the hash table size is still dynamically > adjusted by rhashtable_shrink() or rhashtable_expand() each time > object is inserted or removed from the table. However, as > synchronize_rcu() has to be called when table is shrunk or > expanded by the two functions, we should permit user to set the > minimum table size through configuring the minimum number of shifts > according to user specific requirement, avoiding these expensive > actions of shrinking or expanding because of calling synchronize_rcu(). > > Signed-off-by: Ying Xue Thanks! Acked-by: Thomas Graf