netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com>
To: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@intel.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, willemb@google.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v4 2/3] net-timestamp: Make the clone operation stand-alone from phy timestamping
Date: Sun, 7 Sep 2014 23:50:39 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140907215039.GA3900@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140904173116.7702.30877.stgit@ahduyck-bv4.jf.intel.com>

Just saw this now, was away on vacation, so sorry for the delay...

On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 01:31:35PM -0400, Alexander Duyck wrote:
> v2: Renamed function to skb_clone_sk.
>     Added destructor to call sock_put instead of doing it ourselves.
>     Dropped freeing functionality from skb_complete_tx_timestamp.

...

> diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/dp83640.c b/drivers/net/phy/dp83640.c
> index d5991ac..87648b3 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/phy/dp83640.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/phy/dp83640.c
> @@ -1148,7 +1148,7 @@ static void dp83640_remove(struct phy_device *phydev)
>  		kfree_skb(skb);
>  
>  	while ((skb = skb_dequeue(&dp83640->tx_queue)) != NULL)
> -		skb_complete_tx_timestamp(skb, NULL);
> +		kfree_skb(skb);

The way the code was before, there was a clear usage pattern for
phy_driver.txtstamp() and skb_complete_tx_timestamp() which was also
documented in the comment to the latter.

Now, we have drivers freeing buffers allocated by the stack.  I
thought it was cleaner to have the same layer allocate and free the
clone. Even if you say that this new way is just fine, still you
should correct the comment to reflect the new pattern.

Thanks,
Richard

  parent reply	other threads:[~2014-09-07 21:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-09-04 17:30 [PATCH net-next v4 0/3] Series short description Alexander Duyck
2014-09-04 17:31 ` [PATCH net-next v4 1/3] net-timestamp: Merge shared code between phy and regular timestamping Alexander Duyck
2014-09-04 17:31 ` [PATCH net-next v4 2/3] net-timestamp: Make the clone operation stand-alone from phy timestamping Alexander Duyck
2014-09-04 17:48   ` Rick Jones
2014-09-04 18:30     ` Alexander Duyck
2014-09-04 18:33       ` Rick Jones
2014-09-07 21:50   ` Richard Cochran [this message]
2014-09-07 23:35     ` Alexander Duyck
2014-09-07 21:54   ` Richard Cochran
2014-09-04 17:32 ` [PATCH net-next v4 3/3] net: merge cases where sock_efree and sock_edemux are the same function Alexander Duyck
2014-09-06  0:44 ` [PATCH net-next v4 0/3] Series short description David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140907215039.GA3900@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=richardcochran@gmail.com \
    --cc=alexander.h.duyck@intel.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=willemb@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).