From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Sowmini Varadhan <sowmini.varadhan@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 0/2] sunvnet: Reduce LDC message overhead.
Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2014 10:38:02 -0400
Message-ID: <20140908143802.GF31377@oracle.com>
References: <20140902161936.GA31516@oracle.com>
 <20140904.223724.206826043871814498.davem@davemloft.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: raghuram.kothakota@oracle.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Return-path: <netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from userp1040.oracle.com ([156.151.31.81]:51467 "EHLO
	userp1040.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1752322AbaIHOiK (ORCPT
	<rfc822;netdev@vger.kernel.org>); Mon, 8 Sep 2014 10:38:10 -0400
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20140904.223724.206826043871814498.davem@davemloft.net>
Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <netdev.vger.kernel.org>

On (09/04/14 22:37), David Miller wrote:
> 
> From: Sowmini Varadhan <sowmini.varadhan@oracle.com>
> 
> > This patchset has an updated version of the v1 changes to reduce the
> > overhead from LDC messages. 
> 
> Let's hold on these changes until the memory barrier issues brought up
> by David is resolved.

On (09/07/14 16:19), David Miller wrote (in the patch 2/2 thread for this set):
> 
> > So what (if any) is the outstanding question about wmb() at this 
> > point?
> 
> I don't think there is any, thanks.

I'm not sure where we stand with this- do I need to resubmit any/all of 
those two patches?

--Sowmini