From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pablo Neira Ayuso Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 00/20] Support v6 real servers in v4 pools and vice versa Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2014 17:16:17 +0200 Message-ID: <20140910151617.GA4830@salvia> References: <1410306039-2977-1-git-send-email-agartrell@fb.com> <20140910062201.GA11468@verge.net.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Julian Anastasov , Alex Gartrell , netdev@vger.kernel.org, lvs-devel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@fb.com, ps@fb.com, David Miller To: Simon Horman Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140910062201.GA11468@verge.net.au> Sender: lvs-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 03:22:01PM +0900, Simon Horman wrote: > [ CC Pablo, Dave M ] > > On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 09:01:34AM +0300, Julian Anastasov wrote: > > > > Hello, > > > > On Tue, 9 Sep 2014, Alex Gartrell wrote: > > > > > The following patch set has been iterated upon in the lvs-devel mailing > > > list. I am submitting it here per Julian's advice for inclusion in the > > > net-next tree. > > > > Acked-by: Julian Anastasov > > > > Simon, please apply the patchset to ipvs-next. > > I guess ipvs-next and nf-next need to be updated > > before that due to dependency on net-next commit ea1d5d7755a3e556 > > ("ipvs: properly declare tunnel encapsulation"). > > Thanks Julian, yes that does seem to be the case. > > Pablo, could you merge nf into nf-next and push the result > so that I can apply this series on top? Let me flush out my nf-next queue first, many updates in it, I'll ping to let you know once you can prepare your series. Thanks.