From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jesper Dangaard Brouer Subject: Re: [PATCH] iproute: update dsfield file values Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2014 13:52:48 +0200 Message-ID: <20140915135248.57954fff@redhat.com> References: <20140914204353.5a0579be@urahara> <20140915130608.5d238cb1@redhat.com> <1410781699.7106.153.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Stephen Hemminger , netdev@vger.kernel.org, brouer@redhat.com To: Eric Dumazet Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:42372 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753769AbaIOLw6 (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Sep 2014 07:52:58 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1410781699.7106.153.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, 15 Sep 2014 04:48:19 -0700 Eric Dumazet wrote: > On Mon, 2014-09-15 at 13:06 +0200, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote: > > > Is it a bug, that we put DSCP's Expedited Forwarding (EF) into the > > best-effort priority band(1) in pfifo_fast??? > > > > With 3 bands pfifo_fast, its hard to please everyone. > > Using 5 or 6 bands would be more generic ;) We can easily fix it for EF (which should have gone into band 0). But we should likely just ignore it for AFxx. -- Best regards, Jesper Dangaard Brouer MSc.CS, Sr. Network Kernel Developer at Red Hat Author of http://www.iptv-analyzer.org LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/brouer