From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 net-next 03/11] bpf: add lookup/update/delete/iterate methods to BPF maps Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 17:49:01 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <20140916.174901.2174503796369572537.davem@davemloft.net> References: <20140916.165452.1747695341192703967.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: mingo@kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, luto@amacapital.net, dborkman@redhat.com, hannes@stressinduktion.org, chema@google.com, edumazet@google.com, a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl, pablo@netfilter.org, hpa@zytor.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, keescook@chromium.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org To: ast@plumgrid.com Return-path: Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([149.20.54.216]:58759 "EHLO shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753033AbaIPVtE (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Sep 2014 17:49:04 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: Alexei Starovoitov Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 14:23:27 -0700 > no compat layer and type checking will be done > by syscall wrappers. Ok? Why are you against using strong typing just for everything other than the user pointer blobs? I don't understand the resistence to my suggestion to just use aligned_u64 instead of "void __user *" in the union members.