From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Neil Horman Subject: Re: bisected regression: 3c59x corrupts packets in 3.17-rc5 Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2014 08:56:40 -0400 Message-ID: <20140917125640.GA4213@localhost.localdomain> References: <20140916101704.GA3792@hmsreliant.think-freely.org> <20140916.162923.605101746131407931.davem@davemloft.net> <20140917102701.GA5699@hmsreliant.think-freely.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: David Miller , steffen@klassert.de, netdev@vger.kernel.org, Linux Kernel list To: mroos@linux.ee Return-path: Received: from charlotte.tuxdriver.com ([70.61.120.58]:48114 "EHLO smtp.tuxdriver.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754786AbaIQM5B (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Sep 2014 08:57:01 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 03:43:54PM +0300, mroos@linux.ee wrote: > > Shit, you're right, sorry about that. Its odd, I'm running it here, and its not > > causing problems, but thats obviously wrong. Meelis, please add the above fix > > to your test and confirm that it sovles the problem. If you could keep the > > previous patch in place too that would be great, as we should probably add the > > dma error checking anyway. > > > > > > [PATCH] 3c59x: Fix bad offset spec in skb_frag_dma_map > > Tested 2 variants: only this patch (backported to old state) and both > patches together. > > Both work fine. > Thank you, Meelis. Dave, I'll propose these patches officially in just a bit sorry for the > -- > Meelis Roos (mroos@linux.ee) >