From: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <jbrouer@redhat.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Cc: "netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
Tom Herbert <therbert@google.com>
Subject: Re: CPU scheduler to TXQ binding? (ixgbe vs. igb)
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2014 16:55:26 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140917165526.196c2013@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1410964359.7106.229.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com>
On Wed, 17 Sep 2014 07:32:39 -0700
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-09-17 at 15:26 +0200, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
> > The CPU to TXQ binding behavior of ixgbe vs. igb NIC driver are
> > somehow different. Normally I setup NIC IRQ-to-CPU bindings 1-to-1,
> > with script set_irq_affinity [1].
> >
> > For forcing use of a specific HW TXQ, I normally force the CPU binding
> > of the process, either with "taskset" or with "netperf -T lcpu,rcpu".
> >
> > This works fine with driver ixgbe, but not with driver igb. That is
> > with igb, the program forced to specific CPU, can still use another
> > TXQ. What am I missing?
> >
> >
> > I'm monitoring this with both:
> > 1) watch -d sudo tc -s -d q ls dev ethXX
> > 2) https://github.com/ffainelli/bqlmon
> >
> > [1] https://github.com/netoptimizer/network-testing/blob/master/bin/set_irq_affinity
>
> Have you setup XPS ?
>
> echo 0001 >/sys/class/net/ethX/queues/tx-0/xps_cpus
> echo 0002 >/sys/class/net/ethX/queues/tx-1/xps_cpus
> echo 0004 >/sys/class/net/ethX/queues/tx-2/xps_cpus
> echo 0008 >/sys/class/net/ethX/queues/tx-3/xps_cpus
> echo 0010 >/sys/class/net/ethX/queues/tx-4/xps_cpus
> echo 0020 >/sys/class/net/ethX/queues/tx-5/xps_cpus
> echo 0040 >/sys/class/net/ethX/queues/tx-6/xps_cpus
> echo 0080 >/sys/class/net/ethX/queues/tx-7/xps_cpus
>
> Or something like that, depending on number of cpus and TX queues.
Thanks, that worked! They were all default set to "000" for igb, but
set correctly/like-above for ixgbe (strange).
Did:
$ export DEV=eth1 ; export NR_CPUS=11 ; \
for txq in `seq 0 $NR_CPUS` ; do \
file=/sys/class/net/${DEV}/queues/tx-${txq}/xps_cpus \
mask=`printf %X $((1<<$txq))`
test -e $file && sudo sh -c "echo $mask > $file" && \
grep . -H $file ;\
done
/sys/class/net/eth1/queues/tx-0/xps_cpus:001
/sys/class/net/eth1/queues/tx-1/xps_cpus:002
/sys/class/net/eth1/queues/tx-2/xps_cpus:004
/sys/class/net/eth1/queues/tx-3/xps_cpus:008
/sys/class/net/eth1/queues/tx-4/xps_cpus:010
/sys/class/net/eth1/queues/tx-5/xps_cpus:020
/sys/class/net/eth1/queues/tx-6/xps_cpus:040
/sys/class/net/eth1/queues/tx-7/xps_cpus:080
--
Best regards,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer
MSc.CS, Sr. Network Kernel Developer at Red Hat
Author of http://www.iptv-analyzer.org
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/brouer
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-09-17 14:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-09-17 13:26 CPU scheduler to TXQ binding? (ixgbe vs. igb) Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2014-09-17 14:32 ` Eric Dumazet
2014-09-17 14:55 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer [this message]
2014-09-17 14:59 ` Alexander Duyck
2014-09-18 6:56 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2014-09-18 7:28 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2014-09-18 13:33 ` Eric Dumazet
2014-09-18 13:41 ` Eric Dumazet
2014-09-18 15:42 ` Eric Dumazet
2014-09-18 15:59 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2014-09-18 16:34 ` Eric Dumazet
2014-09-18 18:57 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2014-09-18 16:07 ` Eric Dumazet
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140917165526.196c2013@redhat.com \
--to=jbrouer@redhat.com \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=therbert@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).