From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH 00/29] Add support for the Intel FM10000 Ethernet Switch Host Interface Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2014 22:03:32 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <20140919.220332.1854299635044838363.davem@davemloft.net> References: <20140918223242.10373.27403.stgit@ahduyck-bv4.jf.intel.com> <541CC1C0.9090204@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: alexander.h.duyck@intel.com, nhorman@redhat.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, john.fastabend@gmail.com, matthew.vick@intel.com, jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com, sassmann@redhat.com To: alexander.duyck@gmail.com Return-path: Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([149.20.54.216]:32895 "EHLO shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755053AbaITCDe (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 Sep 2014 22:03:34 -0400 In-Reply-To: <541CC1C0.9090204@gmail.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: Alexander Duyck Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2014 16:52:32 -0700 > I was wondering what changes you wanted for these patches? The only > feedback that I have gotten so far was on the last 2 patches, and a one > liner about dev_consume_skb_any vs dev_kfree_skb_any. Is there > something I missed, or do I need to resubmit the entire set with some > other sort of fix? Any time there is any change requested or intended adjustment, I mark the entire series as changes requested, and you are expected to make the adjustments and resubmit the entire series. I do this silently to work my queue as efficiently as possible, and yet I still sometimes fall very far behind and get backlogged. Please do not ask me to repeat what's already been stated in the patch followup postings as I'll fall even further behind. Thanks.