From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Richard Cochran Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH 29/29] fm10k: Add support for PTP Date: Sat, 20 Sep 2014 23:07:06 +0200 Message-ID: <20140920210704.GA5258@netboy> References: <20140918223242.10373.27403.stgit@ahduyck-bv4.jf.intel.com> <20140918224042.10373.93162.stgit@ahduyck-bv4.jf.intel.com> <20140919173504.GA4136@localhost.localdomain> <541C76B8.6040708@intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: davem@davemloft.net, nhorman@redhat.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, john.fastabend@gmail.com, matthew.vick@intel.com, jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com, sassmann@redhat.com To: Alexander Duyck Return-path: Received: from mail-we0-f173.google.com ([74.125.82.173]:59355 "EHLO mail-we0-f173.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755372AbaITVHM (ORCPT ); Sat, 20 Sep 2014 17:07:12 -0400 Received: by mail-we0-f173.google.com with SMTP id q58so1203458wes.4 for ; Sat, 20 Sep 2014 14:07:10 -0700 (PDT) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <541C76B8.6040708@intel.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 11:32:24AM -0700, Alexander Duyck wrote: > Because doing it that way it extends over 80 characters. Obviously, but still the result is really ugly. Thanks, Richard