From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: William Dauchy Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 00/24] TRILL implementation Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2014 18:54:47 +0200 Message-ID: <20140924165447.GG27183@gandi.net> References: <1411573940-14079-1-git-send-email-ahmed@gandi.net> <20140924094422.2e710ead@urahara> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="8bBEDOJVaa9YlTAt" Cc: Ahmed Amamou , netdev@vger.kernel.org, william@gandi.net, f.cachereul@alphalink.fr To: Stephen Hemminger Return-path: Received: from mail4.gandi.net ([217.70.183.210]:45985 "EHLO mail4.gandi.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753013AbaIXQyw (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Sep 2014 12:54:52 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140924094422.2e710ead@urahara> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: --8bBEDOJVaa9YlTAt Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sep24 09:44, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > Is this patch series bisectable? does it build at each step? it should be the case but we will double check that. > Also, it seems when you build with trill you lose normal bridge functiona= lity. > Whether kernel is doing bridge or rbridge has to be a runtime (not compil= e time) > choice on a per-bridge basis. The normal bridge functionnality are still ok until TRILL is not enabled. --=20 William --8bBEDOJVaa9YlTAt Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iEYEARECAAYFAlQi91cACgkQ1I6eqOUidQE7/gCcCKWORk9najRvvdcooeokfqdL 5vgAoIeBv3LjTZRXcPHNMs4w6MvKDY81 =Epal -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --8bBEDOJVaa9YlTAt--