From: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com>
To: Luwei Zhou <b45643@freescale.com>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
shawn.guo@linaro.org, bhutchings@solarflare.com,
R49496@freescale.com, b38611@freescale.com, b20596@freescale.com,
stephen@networkplumber.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/4] net: fec: ptp: Use hardware algorithm to adjust PTP counter.
Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2014 16:29:23 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140925142923.GA21453@netboy> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1411632621-17429-3-git-send-email-b45643@freescale.com>
On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 04:10:19PM +0800, Luwei Zhou wrote:
> The FEC IP supports hardware adjustment for ptp timer. Refer to the description of
> ENET_ATCOR and ENET_ATINC registers in the spec about the hardware adjustment. This
> patch uses hardware support to adjust the ptp offset and frequency on the slave side.
>
> Signed-off-by: Luwei Zhou <b45643@freescale.com>
> Signed-off-by: Frank Li <Frank.Li@freescale.com>
> Signed-off-by: Fugang Duan <b38611@freescale.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fec_ptp.c | 68 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 58 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fec_ptp.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fec_ptp.c
> index 8016bdd..e2bf786 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fec_ptp.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fec_ptp.c
> @@ -71,6 +71,7 @@
>
> #define FEC_CC_MULT (1 << 31)
> #define FEC_COUNTER_PERIOD (1 << 31)
> +#define FEC_T_PERIOD_ONE_SEC (1000000000UL)
Why not use NSEC_PER_USEC?
> /**
> * fec_ptp_read - read raw cycle counter (to be used by time counter)
> * @cc: the cyclecounter structure
> @@ -145,33 +146,65 @@ void fec_ptp_start_cyclecounter(struct net_device *ndev)
> */
> static int fec_ptp_adjfreq(struct ptp_clock_info *ptp, s32 ppb)
> {
> - u64 diff;
> unsigned long flags;
> int neg_adj = 0;
> - u32 mult = FEC_CC_MULT;
> + u32 i, tmp;
> + u32 ptp_ts_clk, ptp_inc;
> + u32 corr_inc, corr_period;
> + u32 corr_ns;
>
> struct fec_enet_private *fep =
> container_of(ptp, struct fec_enet_private, ptp_caps);
>
> + if (ppb == 0)
> + return 0;
> +
> if (ppb < 0) {
> ppb = -ppb;
> neg_adj = 1;
> }
>
> - diff = mult;
> - diff *= ppb;
> - diff = div_u64(diff, 1000000000ULL);
> + ptp_ts_clk = clk_get_rate(fep->clk_ptp);
> + ptp_inc = FEC_T_PERIOD_ONE_SEC / ptp_ts_clk;
No need to calculate this every time.
> +
> + /*
> + * In theory, corr_inc/corr_period = ppb/FEC_T_PERIOD_ONE_SEC;
> + * Try to find the corr_inc between 1 to ptp_inc to meet adjustment
> + * requirement.
> + */
> + for (i = 1; i <= ptp_inc; i++) {
> + if (((i * FEC_T_PERIOD_ONE_SEC) / ppb) >= ptp_inc) {
Does this code even work?
(i * FEC_T_PERIOD_ONE_SEC) overflows when i > 4.
Does this code even compile? You don't use div_u64().
Also, remember that this code is a performance critical path. You have
a 64 bit division in every loop iteration. With a high Sync rate, this
function will be called many times per second. You should really
optimize here.
Instead of testing for
i * FEC_T_PERIOD_ONE_SEC / ppb >= ptp_inc
why not something like
u64 lhs = NSEC_PER_USEC, rhs = ptp_inc * ppb;
for (i = 1; i <= ptp_inc; i++) {
if (lhs >= rhs) {
...
}
lhs += NSEC_PER_USEC;
}
instead?
> + corr_inc = i;
> + corr_period = ((i * FEC_T_PERIOD_ONE_SEC) /
> + (ptp_inc * ppb));
32 bit overflow again.
> + break;
> + }
> + }
> + /*
> + * Not found? Set it to high value - double speed
> + * correct in every clock step.
> + */
> + if (i > ptp_inc) {
> + corr_inc = ptp_inc;
> + corr_period = 1;
> + }
> +
> + if (neg_adj)
> + corr_ns = ptp_inc - corr_inc;
> + else
> + corr_ns = ptp_inc + corr_inc;
>
> spin_lock_irqsave(&fep->tmreg_lock, flags);
> +
> + tmp = readl(fep->hwp + FEC_ATIME_INC) & FEC_T_INC_MASK;
> + tmp |= corr_ns << FEC_T_INC_CORR_OFFSET;
> + writel(tmp, fep->hwp + FEC_ATIME_INC);
> + writel(corr_period, fep->hwp + FEC_ATIME_CORR);
> /*
> - * dummy read to set cycle_last in tc to now.
> - * So use adjusted mult to calculate when next call
> - * timercounter_read.
> + * dummy read to update the timer.
> */
> timecounter_read(&fep->tc);
>
> - fep->cc.mult = neg_adj ? mult - diff : mult + diff;
> -
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&fep->tmreg_lock, flags);
>
> return 0;
> @@ -190,12 +223,20 @@ static int fec_ptp_adjtime(struct ptp_clock_info *ptp, s64 delta)
> container_of(ptp, struct fec_enet_private, ptp_caps);
> unsigned long flags;
> u64 now;
> + u32 counter;
>
> spin_lock_irqsave(&fep->tmreg_lock, flags);
>
> now = timecounter_read(&fep->tc);
> now += delta;
>
> + /*
> + * Get the timer value based on adjusted timestamp.
> + * Update the counter with the masked value.
> + */
> + counter = now & fep->cc.mask;
> + writel(counter, fep->hwp + FEC_ATIME);
Why is this needed?
Thanks,
Richard
> +
> /* reset the timecounter */
> timecounter_init(&fep->tc, &fep->cc, now);
>
> @@ -246,6 +287,7 @@ static int fec_ptp_settime(struct ptp_clock_info *ptp,
>
> u64 ns;
> unsigned long flags;
> + u32 counter;
>
> mutex_lock(&fep->ptp_clk_mutex);
> /* Check the ptp clock */
> @@ -256,8 +298,14 @@ static int fec_ptp_settime(struct ptp_clock_info *ptp,
>
> ns = ts->tv_sec * 1000000000ULL;
> ns += ts->tv_nsec;
> + /*
> + * Get the timer value based on timestamp.
> + * Update the counter with the masked value.
> + */
> + counter = ns & fep->cc.mask;
>
> spin_lock_irqsave(&fep->tmreg_lock, flags);
> + writel(counter, fep->hwp + FEC_ATIME);
> timecounter_init(&fep->tc, &fep->cc, ns);
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&fep->tmreg_lock, flags);
> mutex_unlock(&fep->ptp_clk_mutex);
> --
> 1.9.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-09-25 14:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-09-25 8:10 [PATCH v1 0/4] Enable FEC pps ouput Luwei Zhou
2014-09-25 8:10 ` [PATCH v1 1/4] net: fec: ptp: Use the 31-bit ptp timer Luwei Zhou
2014-09-25 8:10 ` [PATCH v1 2/4] net: fec: ptp: Use hardware algorithm to adjust PTP counter Luwei Zhou
2014-09-25 13:29 ` Frank.Li
2014-09-26 5:12 ` luwei.zhou
2014-09-26 14:31 ` Frank.Li
2014-09-25 14:29 ` Richard Cochran [this message]
2014-09-26 5:53 ` luwei.zhou
2014-09-26 8:22 ` Richard Cochran
2014-09-25 8:10 ` [PATCH v1 3/4] net: fec: ptp: Enalbe PPS ouput based on ptp clock Luwei Zhou
2014-09-25 14:41 ` Richard Cochran
2014-09-26 6:35 ` luwei.zhou
2014-09-25 8:10 ` [PATCH v1 4/4] ARM: Documentation: Update fec dts binding doc Luwei Zhou
2014-09-25 14:43 ` Richard Cochran
2014-10-01 3:59 ` Richard Cochran
2014-10-08 3:15 ` luwei.zhou
2014-10-08 8:06 ` Richard Cochran
2014-10-08 8:36 ` luwei.zhou
2014-10-08 10:13 ` Richard Cochran
2014-10-09 2:19 ` luwei.zhou
2014-10-09 6:52 ` Richard Cochran
2014-10-09 7:11 ` luwei.zhou
2014-10-03 8:23 ` [PATCH v1 0/4] Enable FEC pps ouput Richard Cochran
2014-10-08 3:30 ` luwei.zhou
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140925142923.GA21453@netboy \
--to=richardcochran@gmail.com \
--cc=R49496@freescale.com \
--cc=b20596@freescale.com \
--cc=b38611@freescale.com \
--cc=b45643@freescale.com \
--cc=bhutchings@solarflare.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shawn.guo@linaro.org \
--cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).