From: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
To: Tom Herbert <therbert@google.com>
Cc: "Jamal Hadi Salim" <jhs@mojatatu.com>,
"Eric Dumazet" <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>,
"Linux Netdev List" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
"Alexander Duyck" <alexander.h.duyck@intel.com>,
"Toke Høiland-Jørgensen" <toke@toke.dk>,
"Florian Westphal" <fw@strlen.de>,
"Dave Taht" <dave.taht@gmail.com>,
"John Fastabend" <john.r.fastabend@intel.com>,
"Daniel Borkmann" <dborkman@redhat.com>,
"Hannes Frederic Sowa" <hannes@stressinduktion.org>,
brouer@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH 1/1 V4] qdisc: bulk dequeue support for qdiscs with TCQ_F_ONETXQUEUE
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2014 22:23:36 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140929222336.30b0527c@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+mtBx990LcBrZVhfNk224cofpDWGeOD=F0Nbe0DWoEF=LvOUA@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Tom,
On Thu, 25 Sep 2014 08:58:54 -0700 Tom Herbert <therbert@google.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 8:23 AM, Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com> wrote:
> > On Thu, 25 Sep 2014 08:05:38 -0700 Tom Herbert <therbert@google.com> wrote:
> >
> >> On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 7:57 AM, Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com> wrote:
> >> > On Thu, 25 Sep 2014 07:40:33 -0700 Tom Herbert <therbert@google.com> wrote:
> >> >
[...]
> >>
> >> That's great. In commit log, would be good to have results with
> >> TCP_STREAM also and please report aggregate CPU utilization changes
> >> (like from mpstat).
> >
> > The TCP_STREAM is not a good test for this, because unless disabling
> > both TSO and GSO the packets will not hit the code path (that this
> > patch changes). When we later add support for TSO and GSO bulking,
> > then it will make sense to include TCP_STREAM testing, not before.
> >
> Disabling TSO and GSO is fine. I'm interested to see interactions with TCP.
TCP already benefit from bulking, via TSO and especially for GSO
segmented packets, and this patch does not bulk TSO and GSO packets.
Testing effect for TCP involves disabling TSO and GSO, but I had to
enable GRO on the receiver, which reduces ACK packets, else the system
could not exceed the 10Gbit/s link capacilty with none-bulking.
Test cmd:
* netperf -H 192.168.8.2 -t TCP_STREAM -l 1000 -D 1 -n -N
The measured perf diff benefit for TCP_STREAM were 4.66% less CPU used
on calls to _raw_spin_lock() (mostly from sch_direct_xmit()).
Tool mpstat, while stressing the system with netperf 24x TCP_STREAM, shows:
* Disabled bulking: 8.30% soft 88.75% idle
* Enabled bulking: 7.80% soft 89.36% idle
--
Best regards,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer
MSc.CS, Sr. Network Kernel Developer at Red Hat
Author of http://www.iptv-analyzer.org
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/brouer
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-09-29 20:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-09-24 16:10 [net-next PATCH 0/1 V4] qdisc bulk dequeuing and utilizing delayed tailptr updates Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2014-09-24 16:12 ` [net-next PATCH 1/1 V4] qdisc: bulk dequeue support for qdiscs with TCQ_F_ONETXQUEUE Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2014-09-24 17:23 ` Eric Dumazet
2014-09-24 17:58 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2014-09-24 18:34 ` Tom Herbert
2014-09-24 19:22 ` Eric Dumazet
2014-09-25 2:12 ` Eric Dumazet
2014-09-25 2:38 ` Tom Herbert
2014-09-25 2:58 ` Dave Taht
2014-09-26 18:06 ` Eric Dumazet
2014-09-25 23:40 ` Eric Dumazet
2014-09-26 6:04 ` [PATCH net-next] dql: dql_queued() should write first to reduce bus transactions Eric Dumazet
2014-09-26 8:47 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2014-09-26 11:06 ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2014-09-26 12:02 ` Eric Dumazet
2014-09-28 21:43 ` David Miller
2014-09-26 9:23 ` [net-next PATCH 1/1 V4] qdisc: bulk dequeue support for qdiscs with TCQ_F_ONETXQUEUE David Laight
2014-09-26 13:16 ` David Laight
2014-09-26 13:38 ` Eric Dumazet
2014-09-24 22:13 ` Jamal Hadi Salim
2014-09-25 8:25 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2014-09-25 12:48 ` Jamal Hadi Salim
2014-09-25 14:40 ` Tom Herbert
2014-09-25 14:57 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2014-09-25 15:05 ` Tom Herbert
2014-09-25 15:23 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2014-09-25 15:58 ` Tom Herbert
2014-09-29 20:23 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer [this message]
2014-09-29 20:14 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2014-09-25 15:12 ` Eric Dumazet
2014-09-25 13:52 ` Dave Taht
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140929222336.30b0527c@redhat.com \
--to=brouer@redhat.com \
--cc=alexander.h.duyck@intel.com \
--cc=dave.taht@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dborkman@redhat.com \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=fw@strlen.de \
--cc=hannes@stressinduktion.org \
--cc=jhs@mojatatu.com \
--cc=john.r.fastabend@intel.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=therbert@google.com \
--cc=toke@toke.dk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).