From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: bridge: add a br_set_state helper function Date: Wed, 01 Oct 2014 22:05:26 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <20141001.220526.686849530279803994.davem@davemloft.net> References: <1412118799-17128-1-git-send-email-f.fainelli@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: stephen@networkplumber.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, vyasevich@gmail.com, bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org, jiri@resnulli.us To: f.fainelli@gmail.com Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1412118799-17128-1-git-send-email-f.fainelli@gmail.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: bridge-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Errors-To: bridge-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org From: Florian Fainelli Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2014 16:13:19 -0700 > In preparation for being able to propagate port states to e.g: notifiers > or other kernel parts, do not manipulate the port state directly, but > instead use a helper function which will allow us to do a bit more than > just setting the state. > > Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli This looks fine to me, applied, thanks Florian.