From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH V6 0/2] qdisc: bulk dequeue support Date: Fri, 03 Oct 2014 15:30:31 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20141003.153031.1190785267843072967.davem@davemloft.net> References: <20141003.145647.1980640682969765484.davem@davemloft.net> <1412373477.17245.5.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com> <1412374535.17245.7.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: brouer@redhat.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, therbert@google.com, hannes@stressinduktion.org, fw@strlen.de, dborkman@redhat.com, jhs@mojatatu.com, alexander.duyck@gmail.com, john.r.fastabend@intel.com, dave.taht@gmail.com, toke@toke.dk To: eric.dumazet@gmail.com Return-path: Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([149.20.54.216]:60297 "EHLO shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754468AbaJCW21 (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Oct 2014 18:28:27 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1412374535.17245.7.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: Eric Dumazet Date: Fri, 03 Oct 2014 15:15:35 -0700 > On Fri, 2014-10-03 at 14:57 -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote: >> On Fri, 2014-10-03 at 14:56 -0700, David Miller wrote: >> >> > I completely agree, and I sort of intended this to happen when >> > I split all the code into that new function. >> > >> > GSO segmentation of TX checksuming should not prevent other >> > > cpus from queueing other skbs in the qdisc. >> > > >> > > I will spend some time on this. >> > >> > Thanks! >> >> I just did my first reboot, will make sure everything is working well >> before sending the patch ;) > > This is awesome... > > 40Gb rate, with TSO=on or TSO=off, it does not matter anymore. Kick ass!