From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@suse.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@do-not-panic.com>,
gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com,
tiwai@suse.de, arjan@linux.intel.com, teg@jklm.no,
rmilasan@suse.com, werner@suse.com, oleg@redhat.com,
hare@suse.com, bpoirier@suse.de, santosh@chelsio.com,
pmladek@suse.cz, dbueso@suse.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>,
Joseph Salisbury <joseph.salisbury@canonical.com>,
Kay Sievers <kay@vrfy.org>,
One Thousand Gnomes <gnomes@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Tim Gardner <tim.gardner@canonical.com>,
Pierre Fersing <pierre-fersing@pierref.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Nagalakshmi Nandigama <nagalakshmi.nandigama@avagotech.com>,
Praveen Krishnamoorthy <praveen.krishnamoorthy@avagotech.com>,
Sreekanth Reddy <sreekanth.reddy@avagotech.com>,
Abhijit Mahajan <abhijit.mahajan@avagotech.com>,
Casey Leedom <leedom@che
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 7/7] driver-core: add preferred async probe option for built-in and modules
Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2014 22:36:27 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141006203627.GZ14081@wotan.suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20141006201926.GF18303@htj.dyndns.org>
On Mon, Oct 06, 2014 at 04:19:26PM -0400, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello, Luis.
>
> The patchset generally looks good to me. Please feel free to add
>
> Reviewed-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Will do.
> A question below.
>
> On Fri, Oct 03, 2014 at 02:44:43PM -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> > + bus.enable_kern_async=1 [KNL]
> > + This tells the kernel userspace has been vetted for
> > + asynchronous probe support and can listen to the device
> > + driver prefer_async_probe flag for both built-in device
> > + drivers and modules.
>
> Do we intend to keep this param permanently? Isn't this more of a
> temp tool to be used during development? If so, maybe we should make
> that clear with __DEVEL__ too?
As its designed right now no, its not a temp tool, its there to
require compatibility with old userspace. For modules we can require
the module parameter but for built-in we need something else and this
is what came to mind. It is also what would allow the prefer_async_probe
flag too as otherwise we won't know if userspace is prepared.
If we want to get rid of it, it would mean that we're letting go of the idea
that some userspace might exist which depends on *not* doing async probe. As
such I would not consider it a __DEVEL__ param and it'd be a judgement call
to eventually *not require* it. I can see that happening but perhaps a large
series of kernels down the road?
Luis
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-10-06 20:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1412372683-2003-1-git-send-email-mcgrof@do-not-panic.com>
2014-10-03 21:44 ` [PATCH v2 6/7] driver-core: add driver module asynchronous probe support Luis R. Rodriguez
2014-10-03 21:44 ` [PATCH v2 7/7] driver-core: add preferred async probe option for built-in and modules Luis R. Rodriguez
2014-10-06 20:19 ` Tejun Heo
2014-10-06 20:36 ` Luis R. Rodriguez [this message]
2014-10-06 21:01 ` Tejun Heo
2014-10-06 23:10 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2014-10-07 17:34 ` Tejun Heo
2014-10-07 17:50 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2014-10-07 17:55 ` Tejun Heo
2014-10-07 18:55 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2014-10-07 19:07 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2014-10-06 20:41 ` Dmitry Torokhov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20141006203627.GZ14081@wotan.suse.de \
--to=mcgrof@suse.com \
--cc=abhijit.mahajan@avagotech.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=arjan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bpoirier@suse.de \
--cc=dbueso@suse.com \
--cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
--cc=gnomes@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=hare@suse.com \
--cc=joseph.salisbury@canonical.com \
--cc=kay@vrfy.org \
--cc=leedom@che \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mcgrof@do-not-panic.com \
--cc=nagalakshmi.nandigama@avagotech.com \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp \
--cc=pierre-fersing@pierref.org \
--cc=pmladek@suse.cz \
--cc=praveen.krishnamoorthy@avagotech.com \
--cc=rmilasan@suse.com \
--cc=santosh@chelsio.com \
--cc=sreekanth.reddy@avagotech.com \
--cc=teg@jklm.no \
--cc=tim.gardner@canonical.com \
--cc=tiwai@suse.de \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=werner@suse.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).