netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@suse.com>
Cc: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@do-not-panic.com>,
	gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com,
	tiwai@suse.de, arjan@linux.intel.com, teg@jklm.no,
	rmilasan@suse.com, werner@suse.com, oleg@redhat.com,
	hare@suse.com, bpoirier@suse.de, santosh@chelsio.com,
	pmladek@suse.cz, dbueso@suse.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>,
	Joseph Salisbury <joseph.salisbury@canonical.com>,
	Kay Sievers <kay@vrfy.org>,
	One Thousand Gnomes <gnomes@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
	Tim Gardner <tim.gardner@canonical.com>,
	Pierre Fersing <pierre-fersing@pierref.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Nagalakshmi Nandigama <nagalakshmi.nandigama@avagotech.com>,
	Praveen Krishnamoorthy <praveen.krishnamoorthy@avagotech.com>,
	Sreekanth Reddy <sreekanth.reddy@avagotech.com>,
	Abhijit Mahajan <abhijit.mahajan@avagotech.com>,
	Casey Leedom <leedom@che
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 7/7] driver-core: add preferred async probe option for built-in and modules
Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2014 13:34:04 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141007173404.GB31328@mtj.dyndns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20141006231046.GD14081@wotan.suse.de>

Hello,

On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 01:10:46AM +0200, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 06, 2014 at 05:01:18PM -0400, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > For in-kernel stuff, we already have a clear
> > synchronization point where we already synchronize all async calls.
> > Shouldn't we be flushing these async probes there too?
> 
> This seems to be addressing if what I meant by prepared, "ready", so let
> me address this as I do think its important.
> 
> By async calls do you mean users of async_schedule()? I see it

Yes.

> also uses system_unbound_wq as well but I do not see anyone calling
> flush_workqueue(system_unbound_wq) on the kernel. We do use
> async_synchronize_full() on kernel_init() but that just waits.

But you can create a new workqueue and queue all the async probing
work items there and flush the workqueue right after
async_synchronize_full().

...
> bus.enable_kern_async=1 would still also serve as a helper for the driver core
> to figure out if it should use async probe then on modules if prefer_async_probe
> was enabled. Let me know if you figure out a way to avoid it.

Why do we need the choice at all?  It always should, no?

Thanks.

-- 
tejun

  reply	other threads:[~2014-10-07 17:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <1412372683-2003-1-git-send-email-mcgrof@do-not-panic.com>
2014-10-03 21:44 ` [PATCH v2 6/7] driver-core: add driver module asynchronous probe support Luis R. Rodriguez
2014-10-03 21:44 ` [PATCH v2 7/7] driver-core: add preferred async probe option for built-in and modules Luis R. Rodriguez
2014-10-06 20:19   ` Tejun Heo
2014-10-06 20:36     ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2014-10-06 21:01       ` Tejun Heo
2014-10-06 23:10         ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2014-10-07 17:34           ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2014-10-07 17:50             ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2014-10-07 17:55               ` Tejun Heo
2014-10-07 18:55                 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2014-10-07 19:07                   ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2014-10-06 20:41   ` Dmitry Torokhov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20141007173404.GB31328@mtj.dyndns.org \
    --to=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=abhijit.mahajan@avagotech.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=arjan@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=bpoirier@suse.de \
    --cc=dbueso@suse.com \
    --cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
    --cc=gnomes@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=hare@suse.com \
    --cc=joseph.salisbury@canonical.com \
    --cc=kay@vrfy.org \
    --cc=leedom@che \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mcgrof@do-not-panic.com \
    --cc=mcgrof@suse.com \
    --cc=nagalakshmi.nandigama@avagotech.com \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp \
    --cc=pierre-fersing@pierref.org \
    --cc=pmladek@suse.cz \
    --cc=praveen.krishnamoorthy@avagotech.com \
    --cc=rmilasan@suse.com \
    --cc=santosh@chelsio.com \
    --cc=sreekanth.reddy@avagotech.com \
    --cc=teg@jklm.no \
    --cc=tim.gardner@canonical.com \
    --cc=tiwai@suse.de \
    --cc=werner@suse.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).