From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
To: David Laight <David.Laight@ACULAB.COM>
Cc: "'Sergei Shtylyov'" <sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com>,
"Lothar Waßmann" <LW@KARO-electronics.de>,
"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
"Frank Li" <Frank.Li@freescale.com>,
"Fabio Estevam" <fabio.estevam@freescale.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: fec: fix regression on i.MX28 introduced by rx_copybreak support
Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2014 10:12:48 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141008091248.GE5182@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <063D6719AE5E284EB5DD2968C1650D6D174C6C14@AcuExch.aculab.com>
On Wed, Oct 08, 2014 at 08:54:58AM +0000, David Laight wrote:
> Hmmm... in that case you may not want the compiler to convert the bit value
> to a 'bool' at all.
>
> Passing 'id_entry->driver_data' through (that doesn't look like a field name for
> 'quirk flags) would generate better code.
>
> Even better would be to reference the flag directly from 'ndev'.
> A pointer indirection for the test if probably faster then passing
> another argument.
A far better idea would be to copy the quirks into the fec_net_private
structure, storing them as a 'unsigned int' value, and test them from
there. This is /much/ more efficient than jumping through the hoops to
retrieve id_entry, and then testing the 64-bit driver_data value.
I've had such a patch since about the beginning of the year (and patches
which add stuff like byte queue limits, which are really needed now that
we have a /huge/ transmit ring), but I can't keep up with rebasing the
patch set, and properly tested and performance impacts evaluated due to
the rate of FEC changes. I never finished rebasing the set after Andy's
TSO work...
--
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 9.5Mbps down 400kbps up
according to speedtest.net.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-10-08 9:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-10-07 13:19 [PATCH] net: fec: fix regression on i.MX28 introduced by rx_copybreak support Lothar Waßmann
2014-10-07 13:31 ` David Laight
2014-10-07 14:17 ` Lothar Waßmann
2014-10-07 14:23 ` David Laight
2014-10-07 14:34 ` Eric Dumazet
2014-10-08 4:59 ` Lothar Waßmann
2014-10-07 14:02 ` Fabio Estevam
2014-10-07 14:27 ` Eric Dumazet
2014-10-07 14:41 ` David Laight
2014-10-08 5:01 ` Lothar Waßmann
2014-10-08 8:45 ` David Laight
2014-10-08 8:55 ` Lothar Waßmann
2014-10-07 16:07 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2014-10-08 8:54 ` David Laight
2014-10-08 9:12 ` Russell King - ARM Linux [this message]
2014-10-07 17:15 ` David Miller
2014-10-08 4:43 ` Lothar Waßmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20141008091248.GE5182@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk \
--to=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=David.Laight@ACULAB.COM \
--cc=Frank.Li@freescale.com \
--cc=LW@KARO-electronics.de \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=fabio.estevam@freescale.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).