From: alexander.duyck@gmail.com
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net
Subject: [PATCH] flow-dissector: Fix alignment issue in __skb_flow_get_ports
Date: Thu, 09 Oct 2014 21:03:28 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141010035840.21428.359.stgit@ahduyck-workstation.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20141009.201248.1210454965155680255.davem@davemloft.net>
From: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@redhat.com>
This patch addresses a kernel unaligned access bug seen on a sparc64 system
with an igb adapter. Specifically the __skb_flow_get_ports was returning a
be32 pointer which was then having the value directly returned.
In order to keep the handling of the ports consistent with how we were
handling the IPv4 and IPv6 addresses I have instead replaced the assignment
with a memcpy to the flow key ports value. This way it should stay a
memcpy on systems that cannot handle unaligned access, and will likely be
converted to a 32b assignment on the systems that can support it.
Reported-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@redhat.com>
---
drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c | 2 +-
include/net/flow_keys.h | 10 ++++++----
net/core/flow_dissector.c | 21 +++++++++++++--------
3 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
index c9ac06c..326eb3d 100644
--- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
@@ -2993,7 +2993,7 @@ static bool bond_flow_dissect(struct bonding *bond, struct sk_buff *skb,
return false;
}
if (bond->params.xmit_policy == BOND_XMIT_POLICY_LAYER34 && proto >= 0)
- fk->ports = skb_flow_get_ports(skb, noff, proto);
+ skb_flow_get_ports(fk, skb, noff, proto);
return true;
}
diff --git a/include/net/flow_keys.h b/include/net/flow_keys.h
index 7ee2df0..66235f4 100644
--- a/include/net/flow_keys.h
+++ b/include/net/flow_keys.h
@@ -33,11 +33,13 @@ static inline bool skb_flow_dissect(const struct sk_buff *skb, struct flow_keys
{
return __skb_flow_dissect(skb, flow, NULL, 0, 0, 0);
}
-__be32 __skb_flow_get_ports(const struct sk_buff *skb, int thoff, u8 ip_proto,
- void *data, int hlen_proto);
-static inline __be32 skb_flow_get_ports(const struct sk_buff *skb, int thoff, u8 ip_proto)
+void __skb_flow_get_ports(struct flow_keys *flow, const struct sk_buff *skb,
+ int thoff, u8 ip_proto, void *data, int hlen_proto);
+static inline void skb_flow_get_ports(struct flow_keys *flow,
+ const struct sk_buff *skb, int thoff,
+ u8 ip_proto)
{
- return __skb_flow_get_ports(skb, thoff, ip_proto, NULL, 0);
+ __skb_flow_get_ports(flow, skb, thoff, ip_proto, NULL, 0);
}
u32 flow_hash_from_keys(struct flow_keys *keys);
unsigned int flow_get_hlen(const unsigned char *data, unsigned int max_len,
diff --git a/net/core/flow_dissector.c b/net/core/flow_dissector.c
index 8560dea..baf8fe3 100644
--- a/net/core/flow_dissector.c
+++ b/net/core/flow_dissector.c
@@ -28,6 +28,7 @@ static void iph_to_flow_copy_addrs(struct flow_keys *flow, const struct iphdr *i
/**
* __skb_flow_get_ports - extract the upper layer ports and return them
+ * @flow: Flow key to place port informatin into
* @skb: sk_buff to extract the ports from
* @thoff: transport header offset
* @ip_proto: protocol for which to get port offset
@@ -37,8 +38,8 @@ static void iph_to_flow_copy_addrs(struct flow_keys *flow, const struct iphdr *i
* The function will try to retrieve the ports at offset thoff + poff where poff
* is the protocol port offset returned from proto_ports_offset
*/
-__be32 __skb_flow_get_ports(const struct sk_buff *skb, int thoff, u8 ip_proto,
- void *data, int hlen)
+void __skb_flow_get_ports(struct flow_keys *flow, const struct sk_buff *skb,
+ int thoff, u8 ip_proto, void *data, int hlen)
{
int poff = proto_ports_offset(ip_proto);
@@ -48,15 +49,19 @@ __be32 __skb_flow_get_ports(const struct sk_buff *skb, int thoff, u8 ip_proto,
}
if (poff >= 0) {
- __be32 *ports, _ports;
+ __be32 *ports;
ports = __skb_header_pointer(skb, thoff + poff,
- sizeof(_ports), data, hlen, &_ports);
- if (ports)
- return *ports;
+ sizeof(flow->ports), data, hlen,
+ &flow->ports);
+ if (ports) {
+ if (&flow->ports != ports)
+ memcpy(&flow->ports, ports, sizeof(flow->ports));
+ return;
+ }
}
- return 0;
+ memset(&flow->ports, 0, sizeof(flow->ports));
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(__skb_flow_get_ports);
@@ -231,7 +236,7 @@ ipv6:
flow->n_proto = proto;
flow->ip_proto = ip_proto;
- flow->ports = __skb_flow_get_ports(skb, nhoff, ip_proto, data, hlen);
+ __skb_flow_get_ports(flow, skb, nhoff, ip_proto, data, hlen);
flow->thoff = (u16) nhoff;
return true;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-10-10 4:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-10-10 0:12 eth_get_headlen() and unaligned accesses David Miller
2014-10-10 3:10 ` Alexander Duyck
2014-10-10 4:43 ` David Miller
2014-10-10 10:59 ` David Laight
2014-10-10 4:03 ` alexander.duyck [this message]
2014-10-10 4:47 ` [PATCH] flow-dissector: Fix alignment issue in __skb_flow_get_ports David Miller
2014-10-10 14:42 ` Alexander Duyck
2014-10-10 14:57 ` David Laight
2014-10-10 15:14 ` Alexander Duyck
2014-10-10 15:29 ` Eric Dumazet
2014-10-10 16:50 ` Alexander Duyck
2014-10-10 17:58 ` David Miller
2014-10-10 18:02 ` Alexander Duyck
2014-10-10 18:14 ` David Miller
2014-10-10 18:15 ` David Miller
2014-10-10 18:22 ` David Miller
2014-10-10 18:53 ` Alexander Duyck
2014-10-10 19:32 ` David Miller
2014-10-13 8:32 ` David Laight
2014-10-10 15:33 ` Eric Dumazet
2014-10-10 16:30 ` David Laight
2014-10-10 16:41 ` David Miller
2014-10-10 14:59 ` [PATCH v2] " alexander.duyck
2014-10-10 15:36 ` Eric Dumazet
2014-10-10 17:55 ` David Miller
2014-10-10 18:41 ` eth_get_headlen() and unaligned accesses Tom Herbert
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20141010035840.21428.359.stgit@ahduyck-workstation.home \
--to=alexander.duyck@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).