Re: [net-next 2/2] sctp: replace seq_printf with seq_puts

[Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>]

On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 10:29:16AM +0100, Michele Baldessari wrote:
> Fixes checkpatch warning:
> "WARNING: Prefer seq_puts to seq_printf"
> 
> Signed-off-by: Michele Baldessari <michele@acksyn.org>
> ---
>  net/sctp/proc.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/net/sctp/proc.c b/net/sctp/proc.c
> index bfb242af06ab..0697eda5aed8 100644
> --- a/net/sctp/proc.c
> +++ b/net/sctp/proc.c
> @@ -490,14 +490,14 @@ static int sctp_remaddr_seq_show(struct seq_file *seq, void *v)
>  			 * Note: We don't have a way to tally this at the moment
>  			 * so lets just leave it as zero for the moment
>  			 */
> -			seq_printf(seq, "0 ");
> +			seq_puts(seq, "0 ");
>  
>  			/*
>  			 * remote address start time (START).  This is also not
>  			 * currently implemented, but we can record it with a
>  			 * jiffies marker in a subsequent patch
>  			 */
> -			seq_printf(seq, "0 ");
> +			seq_puts(seq, "0 ");
>  
>  			/*
>  			 * The current state of this destination. I.e.
> -- 
> 2.1.0
> 
> 
Acked-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>