From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jiri Pirko Subject: Re: [patch net-next] bridge: rename fdb_*_hw to fdb_*_hw_addr to avoid confusion Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2014 08:20:06 +0100 Message-ID: <20141111072006.GA8106@nanopsycho.orion> References: <1415530280-9190-1-git-send-email-jiri@resnulli.us> <1415551216-2239-1-git-send-email-jiri@resnulli.us> <20141110.213306.1167288435677960869.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, nhorman@tuxdriver.com, andy@greyhouse.net, tgraf@suug.ch, dborkman@redhat.com, ogerlitz@mellanox.com, jesse@nicira.com, pshelar@nicira.com, azhou@nicira.com, ben@decadent.org.uk, stephen@networkplumber.org, jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com, vyasevic@redhat.com, xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com, john.r.fastabend@intel.com, edumazet@google.com, jhs@mojatatu.com, sfeldma@gmail.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, roopa@cumulusnetworks.com, linville@tuxdriver.com, jasowang@redhat.com, ebiederm@xmission.com, nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com, ryazanov.s.a@gmail.com, buytenh@wantstofly.org, aviadr@mellanox.com, nbd@openwrt.org, alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com, Neil.Jerram@metaswitch.com, ronye@mellanox.com, simon.horman@netronome.com, alexander.h.duyck@redhat.com, john.ronciak@intel.com, mleitner@redhat.com, shrijeet@gmail.com, gospo@cumulusnetworks.com, bcrl@kvack.org To: David Miller Return-path: Received: from mail-wi0-f174.google.com ([209.85.212.174]:45800 "EHLO mail-wi0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752099AbaKKHUJ (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Nov 2014 02:20:09 -0500 Received: by mail-wi0-f174.google.com with SMTP id d1so711382wiv.1 for ; Mon, 10 Nov 2014 23:20:07 -0800 (PST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20141110.213306.1167288435677960869.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 03:33:06AM CET, davem@davemloft.net wrote: >From: Jiri Pirko >Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2014 17:40:16 +0100 > >> The current name might seem that this actually offloads the fdb entry to >> hw. So rename it to clearly present that this for hardware address >> addition/removal. >> >> Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko > >This must have been relative to your rocket patch series because it >doesn't apply cleanly. > >I already am assuming that the rocket patch set is getting one more >spin, so why don't you add this to that series? Will do. > >Thanks.