Re: [PATCH] ip_tunnel: Ops registration for secondary encap (fou, gue)

[David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>]

From: Tom Herbert <therbert@google.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2014 11:54:09 -0800

> Instead of calling fou and gue functions directly from ip_tunnel
> use ops for these that were previously registered. This patch adds the
> logic to add and remove encapsulation operations for ip_tunnel,
> and modified fou (and gue) to register with ip_tunnels.
> 
> This patch also addresses a circular dependency between ip_tunnel
> and fou that was causing link errors when CONFIG_NET_IP_TUNNEL=y
> and CONFIG_NET_FOU=m. References to fou an gue have been removed from
> ip_tunnel.c
> 
> Reported-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
> Signed-off-by: Tom Herbert <therbert@google.com>

Applied, please in the future be explicit about the target tree by
saying "[PATCH net-next]" or similar in your Subj.

I'm pretty sure this isn't the first time I've had to ask this of
you. :-/

Thanks Tom.