From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Al Viro Subject: Re: mlx5: don't duplicate kvfree() Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2014 18:51:09 +0000 Message-ID: <20141120185108.GP7996@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> References: <20141120081357.GI7996@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <20141120081726.GK7996@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <546E204B.5080106@mellanox.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Eli Cohen , linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, netdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, "David S. Miller" To: Or Gerlitz Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <546E204B.5080106-VPRAkNaXOzVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-rdma-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 07:09:31PM +0200, Or Gerlitz wrote: > On 11/20/2014 10:17 AM, Al Viro wrote: > >On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 08:13:57AM +0000, Al Viro wrote: > >>> 9 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-) > >grr... 8 files changed, actually - that was from the diff that included mlx4 > >bits. Patch split correctly and sent in two pieces, summary left as is ;-/ > >Sorry about the confusion it might cause... > Al, > > I think the best way to proceed here is to come up with mlx4 and > mlx5 patches and get both of them in through netdev / net-nexttree, > don't worry about each of these drivers have a part which is also > under drivers/infiniband/hw -- it doesn't justify splitting in this > case Both had been sent to netdev today (and ACKed by respective drivers' maintainers). I'd certainly prefer not to put them through vfs.git, but beyond that I really don't care which tree do those go into... -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html