From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: fec: init maximum receive buffer size for ring1 and ring2 Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2014 15:22:50 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <20141124.152250.380142287256307570.davem@davemloft.net> References: <1416734586-26634-1-git-send-email-b38611@freescale.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, bhutchings@solarflare.com, stephen@networkplumber.org, festevam@gmail.com To: b38611@freescale.com Return-path: Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([149.20.54.216]:52956 "EHLO shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750931AbaKXUWy (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Nov 2014 15:22:54 -0500 In-Reply-To: <1416734586-26634-1-git-send-email-b38611@freescale.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: Fugang Duan Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2014 17:23:06 +0800 > i.MX6SX fec support three rx ring1, the current driver lost to init > ring1 and ring2 maximum receive buffer size, that cause receving > frame date length error. The driver reports "rcv is not +last" error > log in user case. > > Signed-off-by: Fugang Duan This patch does not apply to the 'net' tree, although it does apply cleanly to the net-next tree. Determining which tree a patch is for is not my job, it is your's. Therefore you must always explicitly state what tree your patch is intended to be added to, by starting your Subject line with "[PATCH net] " or "[PATCH net-next] ". I've applied this, but next time I will just ask you to properly submit the patch instead.