From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH 2/5] ethernet/intel: Use eth_skb_pad helper Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2014 22:19:00 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <20141125.221900.653470310152197801.davem@davemloft.net> References: <1416957251.29427.39.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com> <54752263.2040204@gmail.com> <1416966185.29427.46.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: alexander.duyck@gmail.com, alexander.h.duyck@redhat.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com To: eric.dumazet@gmail.com Return-path: Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([149.20.54.216]:41862 "EHLO shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751142AbaKZDTG (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Nov 2014 22:19:06 -0500 In-Reply-To: <1416966185.29427.46.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: Eric Dumazet Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2014 17:43:05 -0800 > I believe I finally have an idea why we had various + 15 in skb > allocations in TCP stack ! It was so that you could do one level of tunneling with "for free". Or that is my recollection. Those + 15 existed way before any of these padto() calls even existed.