From: Thomas Graf <tgraf@suug.ch>
To: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Cc: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>,
davem@davemloft.net, stephen@networkplumber.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5 net] bridge: Fix missing Netlink message validations
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2014 17:06:10 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141126170610.GA2399@casper.infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <547606B3.3060808@gmail.com>
On 11/26/14 at 08:58am, John Fastabend wrote:
> On 11/26/2014 04:42 AM, Thomas Graf wrote:
> >Adds various missing length checks in the bridging code for Netlink
> >messages and corresponding attributes provided by user space.
> >
> >Thomas Graf (5):
> > bridge: Validate IFLA_BRIDGE_FLAGS attribute length
> > net: Validate IFLA_BRIDGE_MODE attribute length
> > net: Check for presence of IFLA_AF_SPEC
> > bridge: Add missing policy entry for IFLA_BRPORT_FAST_LEAVE
> > bridge: Sanitize IFLA_EXT_MASK for AF_BRIDGE:RTM_GETLINK
> >
> > drivers/net/ethernet/emulex/benet/be_main.c | 5 +++++
> > drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c | 5 +++++
> > net/bridge/br_netlink.c | 1 +
> > net/core/rtnetlink.c | 23 ++++++++++++++++++-----
> > 4 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >
>
> +Jiri
>
> Looks like a miss in bond_netlink also? Seems like writing
> a smatch or cocci check for this would be worthwhile.
Thanks, I'll take a look.
The cocci check is somewhat difficult as validation is often
centralized and decoupled from actual access to implement atomic
operations. I'll give it a try though.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-11-26 17:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-11-26 12:42 [PATCH 0/5 net] bridge: Fix missing Netlink message validations Thomas Graf
2014-11-26 12:42 ` [PATCH 1/5] bridge: Validate IFLA_BRIDGE_FLAGS attribute length Thomas Graf
2014-11-26 12:42 ` [PATCH 2/5] net: Validate IFLA_BRIDGE_MODE " Thomas Graf
2014-11-26 13:29 ` Jeff Kirsher
2014-11-26 16:42 ` John Fastabend
2014-11-26 12:42 ` [PATCH 3/5] net: Check for presence of IFLA_AF_SPEC Thomas Graf
2014-11-26 13:30 ` Jeff Kirsher
2014-11-26 12:42 ` [PATCH 4/5] bridge: Add missing policy entry for IFLA_BRPORT_FAST_LEAVE Thomas Graf
2014-11-26 12:42 ` [PATCH 5/5] bridge: Sanitize IFLA_EXT_MASK for AF_BRIDGE:RTM_GETLINK Thomas Graf
2014-11-26 16:58 ` [PATCH 0/5 net] bridge: Fix missing Netlink message validations John Fastabend
2014-11-26 17:06 ` Thomas Graf [this message]
2014-11-26 17:25 ` John Fastabend
2014-11-26 23:14 ` Thomas Graf
2014-11-29 17:51 ` John Fastabend
2014-11-26 20:29 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20141126170610.GA2399@casper.infradead.org \
--to=tgraf@suug.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).