From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Cc: Pankaj Gupta <pagupta@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
davem@davemloft.net, dgibson@redhat.com, vfalico@gmail.com,
edumazet@google.com, vyasevic@redhat.com, hkchu@google.com,
wuzhy@linux.vnet.ibm.com, xemul@parallels.com,
therbert@google.com, bhutchings@solarflare.com, xii@google.com,
stephen@networkplumber.org, jiri@resnulli.us,
sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 net-next 2/2 tuntap: Increase the number of queues in tun.
Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2014 12:20:13 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141204102013.GC17122@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1417661734.16500.0@smtp.corp.redhat.com>
On Thu, Dec 04, 2014 at 03:03:34AM +0008, Jason Wang wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 5:52 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> wrote:
> >On Wed, Dec 03, 2014 at 12:49:37PM +0530, Pankaj Gupta wrote:
> >> Networking under kvm works best if we allocate a per-vCPU RX and TX
> >> queue in a virtual NIC. This requires a per-vCPU queue on the host
> >>side.
> >> It is now safe to increase the maximum number of queues.
> >> Preceding patche: 'net: allow large number of rx queues'
> >
> >s/patche/patch/
> >
> >> made sure this won't cause failures due to high order memory
> >> allocations. Increase it to 256: this is the max number of vCPUs
> >> KVM supports.
> >> Signed-off-by: Pankaj Gupta <pagupta@redhat.com>
> >> Reviewed-by: David Gibson <dgibson@redhat.com>
> >
> >Hmm it's kind of nasty that each tun device is now using x16 memory.
> >Maybe we should look at using a flex array instead, and removing the
> >limitation altogether (e.g. make it INT_MAX)?
>
> But this only happens when IFF_MULTIQUEUE were used.
I refer to this field:
struct tun_file __rcu *tfiles[MAX_TAP_QUEUES];
if we make MAX_TAP_QUEUES 256, this will use 4K bytes,
apparently unconditionally.
> And core has vmalloc() fallback.
> So probably not a big issue?
> >
> >
> >
> >> ---
> >> drivers/net/tun.c | 9 +++++----
> >> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >> diff --git a/drivers/net/tun.c b/drivers/net/tun.c
> >> index e3fa65a..a19dc5f8 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/net/tun.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/net/tun.c
> >> @@ -113,10 +113,11 @@ struct tap_filter {
> >> unsigned char addr[FLT_EXACT_COUNT][ETH_ALEN];
> >> };
> >> -/* DEFAULT_MAX_NUM_RSS_QUEUES were chosen to let the rx/tx queues
> >>allocated for
> >> - * the netdevice to be fit in one page. So we can make sure the
> >>success of
> >> - * memory allocation. TODO: increase the limit. */
> >> -#define MAX_TAP_QUEUES DEFAULT_MAX_NUM_RSS_QUEUES
> >> +/* MAX_TAP_QUEUES 256 is chosen to allow rx/tx queues to be equal
> >> + * to max number of vCPUS in guest. Also, we are making sure here
> >> + * queue memory allocation do not fail.
> >
> >It's not queue memory allocation anymore, is it?
> >I would say "
> >This also helps the tfiles field fit in 4K, so the whole tun
> >device only needs an order-1 allocation.
> >"
> >
> >> + */
> >> +#define MAX_TAP_QUEUES 256
> >> #define MAX_TAP_FLOWS 4096
> >> #define TUN_FLOW_EXPIRE (3 * HZ)
> >> -- 1.8.3.1
> >> --
> >> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
> >> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> >> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-12-04 10:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-12-03 7:19 [PATCH v3 net-net 0/2] Increase the limit of tuntap queues Pankaj Gupta
2014-12-03 7:19 ` [PATCH v3 net-next 1/2] net: allow large number of rx queues Pankaj Gupta
2014-12-03 9:42 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2014-12-04 10:45 ` Pankaj Gupta
2014-12-03 7:19 ` [PATCH v3 net-next 2/2 tuntap: Increase the number of queues in tun Pankaj Gupta
2014-12-03 9:52 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2014-12-04 2:55 ` Jason Wang
2014-12-04 10:20 ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2014-12-04 10:42 ` Pankaj Gupta
2014-12-05 7:35 ` Jason Wang
2014-12-10 7:56 ` Pankaj Gupta
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20141204102013.GC17122@redhat.com \
--to=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=bhutchings@solarflare.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dgibson@redhat.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=hkchu@google.com \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pagupta@redhat.com \
--cc=sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com \
--cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
--cc=therbert@google.com \
--cc=vfalico@gmail.com \
--cc=vyasevic@redhat.com \
--cc=wuzhy@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=xemul@parallels.com \
--cc=xii@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).