From: Sabrina Dubroca <sd@queasysnail.net>
To: Chris Snook <chris.snook@gmail.com>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
Jay Cliburn <jcliburn@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH net-next 04/11] atl1c: remove disable_irq from netpoll controller, use netpoll_irq_lock
Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2014 18:23:10 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141209172310.GA14343@kria> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMXMK6t5NfPQFBxK1Qny45LCS6rwX4Ys1n4C7fsTPHXu=x_vuQ@mail.gmail.com>
2014-12-09, 16:13:33 +0000, Chris Snook wrote:
> Could you explain the bug a little more for us? It's not obvious to me how
> sleeping there is a problem.
>
> -- Chris
Sorry for the lack of context.
A might_sleep() check in disable_irq() was added in commit
e22b886a8a43b ("sched/wait: Add might_sleep() checks") [1], and it
triggers when using netconsole:
BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/irq/manage.c:104
in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 1, pid: 1, name: systemd
no locks held by systemd/1.
irq event stamp: 10102965
hardirqs last enabled at (10102965): [<ffffffff810cbafd>] vprintk_emit+0x2dd/0x6a0
hardirqs last disabled at (10102964): [<ffffffff810cb897>] vprintk_emit+0x77/0x6a0
softirqs last enabled at (10102342): [<ffffffff810666aa>] __do_softirq+0x27a/0x6f0
softirqs last disabled at (10102337): [<ffffffff81066e86>] irq_exit+0x56/0xe0
Preemption disabled at:[<ffffffff817de50d>] printk_emit+0x31/0x33
CPU: 1 PID: 1 Comm: systemd Not tainted 3.18.0-rc2-next-20141029-dirty #222
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.7.5-20140617_173321-var-lib-archbuild-testing-x86_64-tobias 04/01/2014
ffffffff81a82291 ffff88001e743978 ffffffff817df31d 0000000000000000
0000000000000000 ffff88001e7439a8 ffffffff8108dfa2 ffff88001e7439a8
ffffffff81a82291 0000000000000068 0000000000000000 ffff88001e7439d8
Call Trace:
[<ffffffff817df31d>] dump_stack+0x4f/0x7c
[<ffffffff8108dfa2>] ___might_sleep+0x182/0x2b0
[<ffffffff8108e10a>] __might_sleep+0x3a/0xc0
[<ffffffff810ce358>] synchronize_irq+0x38/0xa0
[<ffffffff810ce633>] ? __disable_irq_nosync+0x43/0x70
[<ffffffff810ce690>] disable_irq+0x20/0x30
[<ffffffff815d7253>] e1000_netpoll+0x23/0x60
[<ffffffff81678d02>] netpoll_poll_dev+0x72/0x3a0
[<ffffffff817e9993>] ? _raw_spin_trylock+0x73/0x90
[<ffffffff8167920f>] ? netpoll_send_skb_on_dev+0x1df/0x2e0
[<ffffffff816791e7>] netpoll_send_skb_on_dev+0x1b7/0x2e0
[<ffffffff816795f3>] netpoll_send_udp+0x2e3/0x490
The initial discussion of this problem is here: https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/10/29/523
[1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/10/28/427
> On Tue, Dec 9, 2014, 06:39 Sabrina Dubroca <sd@queasysnail.net> wrote:
>
> > disable_irq() may sleep, replace it with a spin_lock in the interrupt
> > handler.
> >
> > No actual testing done, only compiled.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Sabrina Dubroca <sd@queasysnail.net>
> > Cc: Jay Cliburn <jcliburn@gmail.com>
> > Cc: Chris Snook <chris.snook@gmail.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/net/ethernet/atheros/atl1c/atl1c.h | 3 +++
> > drivers/net/ethernet/atheros/atl1c/atl1c_main.c | 12 ++++++++----
> > 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/atheros/atl1c/atl1c.h
> > b/drivers/net/ethernet/atheros/atl1c/atl1c.h
> > index b9203d928938..8d97791e1516 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/atheros/atl1c/atl1c.h
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/atheros/atl1c/atl1c.h
> > @@ -49,6 +49,7 @@
> > #include <linux/workqueue.h>
> > #include <net/checksum.h>
> > #include <net/ip6_checksum.h>
> > +#include <linux/netpoll.h>
> >
> > #include "atl1c_hw.h"
> >
> > @@ -555,6 +556,8 @@ struct atl1c_adapter {
> > struct atl1c_rfd_ring rfd_ring;
> > struct atl1c_rrd_ring rrd_ring;
> > u32 bd_number; /* board number;*/
> > +
> > + struct netpoll_irq_lock netpoll_lock;
> > };
> >
> > #define AT_WRITE_REG(a, reg, value) ( \
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/atheros/atl1c/atl1c_main.c
> > b/drivers/net/ethernet/atheros/atl1c/atl1c_main.c
> > index 72fb86b9aa24..7a1b11eb8e4e 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/atheros/atl1c/atl1c_main.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/atheros/atl1c/atl1c_main.c
> > @@ -826,6 +826,7 @@ static int atl1c_sw_init(struct atl1c_adapter *adapter)
> > atomic_set(&adapter->irq_sem, 1);
> > spin_lock_init(&adapter->mdio_lock);
> > spin_lock_init(&adapter->tx_lock);
> > + netpoll_irq_lock_init(&adapter->netpoll_lock);
> > set_bit(__AT_DOWN, &adapter->flags);
> >
> > return 0;
> > @@ -1584,10 +1585,11 @@ static irqreturn_t atl1c_intr(int irq, void *data)
> > struct pci_dev *pdev = adapter->pdev;
> > struct atl1c_hw *hw = &adapter->hw;
> > int max_ints = AT_MAX_INT_WORK;
> > - int handled = IRQ_NONE;
> > + irqreturn_t handled = IRQ_NONE;
> > u32 status;
> > u32 reg_data;
> >
> > + netpoll_irq_lock(&adapter->netpoll_lock);
> > do {
> > AT_READ_REG(hw, REG_ISR, ®_data);
> > status = reg_data & hw->intr_mask;
> > @@ -1622,7 +1624,8 @@ static irqreturn_t atl1c_intr(int irq, void *data)
> > /* reset MAC */
> > set_bit(ATL1C_WORK_EVENT_RESET,
> > &adapter->work_event);
> > schedule_work(&adapter->common_task);
> > - return IRQ_HANDLED;
> > + handled = IRQ_HANDLED;
> > + goto out;
> > }
> >
> > if (status & ISR_OVER)
> > @@ -1641,6 +1644,9 @@ static irqreturn_t atl1c_intr(int irq, void *data)
> > } while (--max_ints > 0);
> > /* re-enable Interrupt*/
> > AT_WRITE_REG(&adapter->hw, REG_ISR, 0);
> > +
> > +out:
> > + netpoll_irq_unlock(&adapter->netpoll_lock);
> > return handled;
> > }
> >
> > @@ -1900,9 +1906,7 @@ static void atl1c_netpoll(struct net_device *netdev)
> > {
> > struct atl1c_adapter *adapter = netdev_priv(netdev);
> >
> > - disable_irq(adapter->pdev->irq);
> > atl1c_intr(adapter->pdev->irq, netdev);
> > - enable_irq(adapter->pdev->irq);
> > }
> > #endif
> >
> > --
> > 2.1.3
> >
> >
--
Sabrina
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-12-09 17:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-12-09 14:37 [RFC PATCH net-next 00/11] net: remove disable_irq() from ->ndo_poll_controller Sabrina Dubroca
2014-12-09 14:37 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 01/11] netpoll: introduce netpoll_irq_lock to protect netpoll controller against interrupts Sabrina Dubroca
2014-12-09 14:37 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 02/11] e1000: remove disable_irq from netpoll controller, use netpoll_irq_lock Sabrina Dubroca
2014-12-09 14:37 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 03/11] 8139cp/too: remove disable_irq from netpoll controller Sabrina Dubroca
2014-12-09 14:37 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 04/11] atl1c: remove disable_irq from netpoll controller, use netpoll_irq_lock Sabrina Dubroca
[not found] ` <CAMXMK6t5NfPQFBxK1Qny45LCS6rwX4Ys1n4C7fsTPHXu=x_vuQ@mail.gmail.com>
2014-12-09 17:23 ` Sabrina Dubroca [this message]
2014-12-09 21:17 ` Chris Snook
2014-12-09 14:37 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 05/11] bnx2: " Sabrina Dubroca
2014-12-09 14:37 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 06/11] s2io: " Sabrina Dubroca
2014-12-09 14:37 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 07/11] pasemi: " Sabrina Dubroca
2014-12-09 14:37 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 08/11] ll_temac: " Sabrina Dubroca
2014-12-09 14:37 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 09/11] xilinx/axienet: " Sabrina Dubroca
2014-12-09 14:37 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 10/11] gianfar: " Sabrina Dubroca
2014-12-09 14:37 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 11/11] net: fec: " Sabrina Dubroca
2014-12-10 2:44 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 00/11] net: remove disable_irq() from ->ndo_poll_controller David Miller
2014-12-11 21:45 ` Sabrina Dubroca
2014-12-12 2:14 ` David Miller
2014-12-12 22:01 ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-01-05 14:31 ` Sabrina Dubroca
2015-02-05 0:20 ` Sabrina Dubroca
2015-02-05 13:06 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-02-05 15:33 ` Sabrina Dubroca
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20141209172310.GA14343@kria \
--to=sd@queasysnail.net \
--cc=chris.snook@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=jcliburn@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).