From: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@redhat.com>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: davem@davemloft.net
Subject: [net PATCH] fib_trie: Fix trie balancing issue if new node pushes down existing node
Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2014 21:49:22 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141211054815.1357.36977.stgit@ahduyck-vm-fedora20> (raw)
This patch addresses an issue with the level compression of the fib_trie.
Specifically in the case of adding a new leaf that triggers a new node to
be added that takes the place of the old node. The result is a trie where
the 1 child tnode is on one side and one leaf is on the other which gives
you a very deep trie. Below is the script I used to generate a trie on
dummy0 with a 10.X.X.X family of addresses.
ip link add type dummy
ipval=184549374
bit=2
for i in `seq 1 23`
do
ifconfig dummy0:$bit $ipval/8
ipval=`expr $ipval - $bit`
bit=`expr $bit \* 2`
done
cat /proc/net/fib_triestat
Running the script before the patch:
Local:
Aver depth: 10.82
Max depth: 23
Leaves: 29
Prefixes: 30
Internal nodes: 27
1: 26 2: 1
Pointers: 56
Null ptrs: 1
Total size: 5 kB
After applying the patch and repeating:
Local:
Aver depth: 4.72
Max depth: 9
Leaves: 29
Prefixes: 30
Internal nodes: 12
1: 3 2: 2 3: 7
Pointers: 70
Null ptrs: 30
Total size: 4 kB
What this fix does is start the rebalance at the newly created tnode
instead of at the parent tnode. This way if there is a gap between the
parent and the new node it doesn't prevent the new tnode from being
coalesced with any pre-existing nodes that may have been pushed into one
of the new nodes child branches.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@redhat.com>
---
net/ipv4/fib_trie.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/ipv4/fib_trie.c b/net/ipv4/fib_trie.c
index e9cb258..18bcaf2 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/fib_trie.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/fib_trie.c
@@ -1143,8 +1143,9 @@ static struct list_head *fib_insert_node(struct trie *t, u32 key, int plen)
put_child(tp, cindex, (struct rt_trie_node *)tn);
} else {
rcu_assign_pointer(t->trie, (struct rt_trie_node *)tn);
- tp = tn;
}
+
+ tp = tn;
}
if (tp && tp->pos + tp->bits > 32)
next reply other threads:[~2014-12-11 7:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-12-11 5:49 Alexander Duyck [this message]
2014-12-12 2:32 ` [net PATCH] fib_trie: Fix trie balancing issue if new node pushes down existing node David Miller
2014-12-12 15:54 ` David Miller
2014-12-12 16:09 ` Alexander Duyck
2014-12-12 17:05 ` David Laight
2014-12-12 15:55 ` Alexander Duyck
2014-12-12 16:00 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20141211054815.1357.36977.stgit@ahduyck-vm-fedora20 \
--to=alexander.h.duyck@redhat.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox