From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [bisected] tg3 broken in 3.18.0? Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2014 20:18:31 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <20141212.201831.186234837340644301.davem@davemloft.net> References: <548B00CD.3030708@gmail.com> <20141212203134.GA23705@teela.fritz.box> <20141213011408.GA27568@teela.fritz.box> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org To: nholland@tisys.org Return-path: Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([149.20.54.216]:40882 "EHLO shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932599AbaLMBSe (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Dec 2014 20:18:34 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20141213011408.GA27568@teela.fritz.box> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: Nils Holland Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2014 02:14:08 +0100 > Ok folks, > > I now took the time to bisect the issue that killed the tg3 network > interface on one of my boxes in 3.18.0. Beside me, at least one other > person was affected, although we also have a confirmed report of > another person using tg3 without issues under 3.18.0. > > My bisect exercise suggests that the following commit is the culprit: > > 89665a6a71408796565bfd29cfa6a7877b17a667 (PCI: Check only the Vendor > ID to identify Configuration Request Retry) > > In case that rings a bell for anyone, I'd be more than glad to hear > about it! Otherwise, while I'm no expert at this, I'll do some more > investigations tomorrow. It's gotten kind of late during bisecting and > I'm off for some sleep now. ;-) You definitely need to bring this up with the author of that change and the relevent list for the PCI subsystem and/or linux-kernel.