From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/3] Implementation of RFC 4898 Extended TCP Statistics (Web10G) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2014 17:44:07 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <20141216.174407.693047700796165794.davem@davemloft.net> References: <20141216.151823.2276708539799601894.davem@davemloft.net> <54909DD5.5070202@psc.edu> <1418769212.9773.65.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: rapier@psc.edu, alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: eric.dumazet@gmail.com Return-path: Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([149.20.54.216]:56787 "EHLO shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750960AbaLPWoK (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Dec 2014 17:44:10 -0500 In-Reply-To: <1418769212.9773.65.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: Eric Dumazet Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2014 14:33:32 -0800 > There is very little chance web10g ~3000 lines of code are added into > linux TCP stack, by people who did not submit netdev changes in last > years. +1 > At Google, we tried the web10g route, but reverted it (today !) in favor > of tcp_info extensions (ss command from iproute2 can also grab/display > these), after too many bugs being filled. +1