From: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@redhat.com>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH 09/17] fib_trie: Use unsigned long for anything dealing with a shift by bits
Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2014 09:41:49 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141222174148.1119.29330.stgit@ahduyck-vm-fedora20> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20141222172632.1119.51469.stgit@ahduyck-vm-fedora20>
This change makes it so that anything that can be shifted by, or compared
to a value shifted by bits is updated to be an unsigned long. This is
mostly a precaution against an insanely huge address space that somehow
starts coming close to the 2^32 root node size which would require
something like 1.5 billion addresses.
I chose unsigned long instead of unsigned long long since I do not believe
it is possible to allocate a 32 bit tnode on a 32 bit system as the memory
consumed would be 16GB + 28B which exceeds the addressible space for any
one process.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@redhat.com>
---
net/ipv4/fib_trie.c | 53 +++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------------
1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/ipv4/fib_trie.c b/net/ipv4/fib_trie.c
index d27aa27..74ad943 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/fib_trie.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/fib_trie.c
@@ -146,8 +146,8 @@ struct trie {
#endif
};
-static void tnode_put_child_reorg(struct tnode *tn, int i, struct tnode *n,
- int wasfull);
+static void tnode_put_child_reorg(struct tnode *tn, unsigned long i,
+ struct tnode *n, int wasfull);
static struct tnode *resize(struct trie *t, struct tnode *tn);
static struct tnode *inflate(struct trie *t, struct tnode *tn);
static struct tnode *halve(struct trie *t, struct tnode *tn);
@@ -183,25 +183,23 @@ static inline void node_set_parent(struct tnode *n, struct tnode *tp)
/* This provides us with the number of children in this node, in the case of a
* leaf this will return 0 meaning none of the children are accessible.
*/
-static inline int tnode_child_length(const struct tnode *tn)
+static inline unsigned long tnode_child_length(const struct tnode *tn)
{
return (1ul << tn->bits) & ~(1ul);
}
-/*
- * caller must hold RTNL
- */
-static inline struct tnode *tnode_get_child(const struct tnode *tn, unsigned int i)
+/* caller must hold RTNL */
+static inline struct tnode *tnode_get_child(const struct tnode *tn,
+ unsigned long i)
{
BUG_ON(i >= tnode_child_length(tn));
return rtnl_dereference(tn->child[i]);
}
-/*
- * caller must hold RCU read lock or RTNL
- */
-static inline struct tnode *tnode_get_child_rcu(const struct tnode *tn, unsigned int i)
+/* caller must hold RCU read lock or RTNL */
+static inline struct tnode *tnode_get_child_rcu(const struct tnode *tn,
+ unsigned long i)
{
BUG_ON(i >= tnode_child_length(tn));
@@ -400,7 +398,7 @@ static inline int tnode_full(const struct tnode *tn, const struct tnode *n)
return n && ((n->pos + n->bits) == tn->pos) && IS_TNODE(n);
}
-static inline void put_child(struct tnode *tn, int i,
+static inline void put_child(struct tnode *tn, unsigned long i,
struct tnode *n)
{
tnode_put_child_reorg(tn, i, n, -1);
@@ -411,13 +409,13 @@ static inline void put_child(struct tnode *tn, int i,
* Update the value of full_children and empty_children.
*/
-static void tnode_put_child_reorg(struct tnode *tn, int i, struct tnode *n,
- int wasfull)
+static void tnode_put_child_reorg(struct tnode *tn, unsigned long i,
+ struct tnode *n, int wasfull)
{
struct tnode *chi = rtnl_dereference(tn->child[i]);
int isfull;
- BUG_ON(i >= 1<<tn->bits);
+ BUG_ON(i >= tnode_child_length(tn));
/* update emptyChildren */
if (n == NULL && chi != NULL)
@@ -607,10 +605,10 @@ no_children:
static void tnode_clean_free(struct tnode *tn)
{
struct tnode *tofree;
- int i;
+ unsigned long i;
for (i = 0; i < tnode_child_length(tn); i++) {
- tofree = rtnl_dereference(tn->child[i]);
+ tofree = tnode_get_child(tn, i);
if (tofree)
node_free(tofree);
}
@@ -619,10 +617,10 @@ static void tnode_clean_free(struct tnode *tn)
static struct tnode *inflate(struct trie *t, struct tnode *oldtnode)
{
- int olen = tnode_child_length(oldtnode);
+ unsigned long olen = tnode_child_length(oldtnode);
struct tnode *tn;
+ unsigned long i;
t_key m;
- int i;
pr_debug("In inflate\n");
@@ -664,7 +662,7 @@ static struct tnode *inflate(struct trie *t, struct tnode *oldtnode)
for (i = 0; i < olen; i++) {
struct tnode *inode = tnode_get_child(oldtnode, i);
struct tnode *left, *right;
- int size, j;
+ unsigned long size, j;
/* An empty child */
if (inode == NULL)
@@ -737,7 +735,7 @@ nomem:
static struct tnode *halve(struct trie *t, struct tnode *oldtnode)
{
- int olen = tnode_child_length(oldtnode);
+ unsigned long olen = tnode_child_length(oldtnode);
struct tnode *tn, *left, *right;
int i;
@@ -1528,9 +1526,9 @@ static int trie_flush_leaf(struct tnode *l)
static struct tnode *leaf_walk_rcu(struct tnode *p, struct tnode *c)
{
do {
- t_key idx = c ? idx = get_index(c->key, p) + 1 : 0;
+ unsigned long idx = c ? idx = get_index(c->key, p) + 1 : 0;
- while (idx < 1u << p->bits) {
+ while (idx < tnode_child_length(p)) {
c = tnode_get_child_rcu(p, idx++);
if (!c)
continue;
@@ -1782,8 +1780,8 @@ struct fib_trie_iter {
static struct tnode *fib_trie_get_next(struct fib_trie_iter *iter)
{
+ unsigned long cindex = iter->index;
struct tnode *tn = iter->tnode;
- unsigned int cindex = iter->index;
struct tnode *p;
/* A single entry routing table */
@@ -1793,7 +1791,7 @@ static struct tnode *fib_trie_get_next(struct fib_trie_iter *iter)
pr_debug("get_next iter={node=%p index=%d depth=%d}\n",
iter->tnode, iter->index, iter->depth);
rescan:
- while (cindex < (1<<tn->bits)) {
+ while (cindex < tnode_child_length(tn)) {
struct tnode *n = tnode_get_child_rcu(tn, cindex);
if (n) {
@@ -1870,15 +1868,16 @@ static void trie_collect_stats(struct trie *t, struct trie_stat *s)
hlist_for_each_entry_rcu(li, &n->list, hlist)
++s->prefixes;
} else {
- int i;
+ unsigned long i;
s->tnodes++;
if (n->bits < MAX_STAT_DEPTH)
s->nodesizes[n->bits]++;
- for (i = 0; i < tnode_child_length(n); i++)
+ for (i = 0; i < tnode_child_length(n); i++) {
if (!rcu_access_pointer(n->child[i]))
s->nullpointers++;
+ }
}
}
rcu_read_unlock();
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-12-22 17:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-12-22 17:40 [RFC PATCH 00/17] fib_trie: Reduce time spent in fib_table_lookup by 35 to 75% Alexander Duyck
2014-12-22 17:40 ` [RFC PATCH 01/17] fib_trie: Update usage stats to be percpu instead of global variables Alexander Duyck
2014-12-22 19:21 ` Cong Wang
2014-12-22 17:41 ` [RFC PATCH 02/17] fib_trie: Make leaf and tnode more uniform Alexander Duyck
2014-12-22 18:33 ` David Miller
2014-12-22 18:55 ` Alexander Duyck
2014-12-22 21:50 ` David Miller
2014-12-22 23:38 ` Alexander Duyck
2014-12-22 17:41 ` [RFC PATCH 03/17] fib_trie: Merge tnode_free and leaf_free into node_free Alexander Duyck
2014-12-22 17:41 ` [RFC PATCH 04/17] fib_trie: Merge leaf into tnode Alexander Duyck
2014-12-22 17:41 ` [RFC PATCH 05/17] fib_trie: Optimize fib_table_lookup to avoid wasting time on loops/variables Alexander Duyck
2014-12-22 18:30 ` David Miller
2014-12-22 17:41 ` [RFC PATCH 06/17] fib_trie: Optimize fib_find_node Alexander Duyck
2014-12-22 17:41 ` [RFC PATCH 07/17] fib_trie: Optimize fib_table_insert Alexander Duyck
2014-12-22 17:41 ` [RFC PATCH 08/17] fib_trie: Update meaning of pos to represent unchecked bits Alexander Duyck
2014-12-22 17:41 ` Alexander Duyck [this message]
2014-12-22 17:41 ` [RFC PATCH 10/17] fib_trie: Push rcu_read_lock/unlock to callers Alexander Duyck
2014-12-22 17:42 ` [RFC PATCH 11/17] fib_trie: Move resize to after inflate/halve Alexander Duyck
2014-12-22 17:42 ` [RFC PATCH 12/17] fib_trie: Add functions should_inflate and should_halve Alexander Duyck
2014-12-22 17:42 ` [RFC PATCH 13/17] fib_trie: Push assignment of child to parent down into inflate/halve Alexander Duyck
2014-12-22 17:42 ` [RFC PATCH 14/17] fib_trie: Push tnode flushing down to inflate/halve Alexander Duyck
2014-12-22 17:42 ` [RFC PATCH 15/17] fib_trie: inflate/halve nodes in a more RCU friendly way Alexander Duyck
2014-12-22 17:42 ` [RFC PATCH 16/17] fib_trie: Remove checks for index >= tnode_child_length from tnode_get_child Alexander Duyck
2014-12-22 17:42 ` [RFC PATCH 17/17] fib_trie: Add tracking value for suffix length Alexander Duyck
2014-12-22 18:32 ` David Miller
2014-12-22 18:08 ` [RFC PATCH 00/17] fib_trie: Reduce time spent in fib_table_lookup by 35 to 75% Dave Taht
2014-12-22 18:38 ` Alexander Duyck
2014-12-22 18:59 ` Dave Taht
2014-12-22 18:53 ` David Miller
2014-12-22 18:35 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20141222174148.1119.29330.stgit@ahduyck-vm-fedora20 \
--to=alexander.h.duyck@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox