netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>
To: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
Cc: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>,
	"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux OMAP Mailing List <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] net: ethernet: cpsw: split out IRQ handler
Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2015 21:02:38 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150103030238.GA19959@saruman> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAA93jw4BckMYOz_fUMVkW8m1YVO8uGjsb1srrhiF-meDoiD1WA@mail.gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2056 bytes --]

Hi,

On Fri, Jan 02, 2015 at 02:56:36PM -0800, Dave Taht wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 2, 2015 at 11:03 AM, Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > (please use reply-all to keep mailing lists in Cc, also avoid
> > top-posting)
> 
> I am trying not to read netdev right now... and failing, obviously.

oops :-)

> > On Fri, Jan 02, 2015 at 10:58:29AM -0800, Dave Taht wrote:
> >> The beaglebone only has a 100mbit phy, so you aren't going to get more
> >> than that.
> >
> > very true :-) Still, with AM437x SK which is definitely GigE, I'm
> > getting 201Mbits/sec.
> >
> >> (so do a lot of IoT devices).
> >>
> >> So you have the two patches that went by on BQL and on NAPI for the beagle?
> >
> > no, got any pointers ?
> 
> the relevant thread was "am335x: cpsw: phy ignores max-speed setting"
> 
> and the initial very small BQL enablement patch was here:
> 
> https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/407640/

I'll test it out, sure.

> (it needed a saner treatment of a failure to dma something in
> cpsw_tx_packet_submit  - the patch as is has also been part of nelsons
> trees for the beaglebone for a while)
> 
> But it was rightly pointed out later in the thread that this change
> 
> +#define CPSW_POLL_WEIGHT 16
> 
> made for the biggest part of the improvement, and someone else on the
> thread proposed handling that more dynamically for 100mbit phys with
> another patch (that I can't find at the moment)
> 
> ... but the root cause of the excessive latency in this driver was the
> single tx/rx dma queue, which you are addressing  in your patch set.

I still think there's a lot of work pending for CPSW, the think slows to
a crawl and takes a lot of CPU for something that should be mostly
handled by DMA. I can very easily get 85% CPU usage with iperf.

> So if you glop on more of the above, mo better, perhaps you will win
> bigger.
> 
> I will try to slice out some time to boot up a beagle on net-next next week.

my patches aren't applied yet, however.

cheers

-- 
balbi

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2015-01-03  3:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-01-02 18:10 [PATCH 0/4] net: cpsw: fix hangs and improve IRQ handling Felipe Balbi
2015-01-02 18:10 ` [PATCH 1/4] net: ethernet: cpsw: fix hangs with interrupts Felipe Balbi
2015-01-02 18:10 ` [PATCH 2/4] net: ethernet: cpsw: unroll IRQ request loop Felipe Balbi
2015-01-02 18:10 ` [PATCH 3/4] net: ethernet: cpsw: split out IRQ handler Felipe Balbi
     [not found]   ` <CAA93jw7qyZjdHGKXjiBhiYp4BWBFrUFM6FF-Lzc0i7eOnM6cNg@mail.gmail.com>
2015-01-02 18:55     ` Felipe Balbi
     [not found]       ` <CAA93jw7=aFM3yQLO+vtN4uHW2gMnfNaY=BdbA+b0WYq-0+gSYQ@mail.gmail.com>
2015-01-02 19:03         ` Felipe Balbi
2015-01-02 22:56           ` Dave Taht
2015-01-03  3:02             ` Felipe Balbi [this message]
2015-01-02 18:10 ` [PATCH 4/4] net: ethernet: cpsw: don't requests IRQs we don't use Felipe Balbi
2015-01-02 21:45 ` [PATCH 0/4] net: cpsw: fix hangs and improve IRQ handling David Miller
2015-01-02 21:53   ` Felipe Balbi
2015-01-02 22:04     ` David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150103030238.GA19959@saruman \
    --to=balbi@ti.com \
    --cc=dave.taht@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).