From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] openvswitch: Do not use private netdev_vport
 fields
Date: Tue, 06 Jan 2015 17:02:06 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <20150106.170206.2121115629154170856.davem@davemloft.net>
References: <1420577481-20238-1-git-send-email-daniele.di.proietto@gmail.com>
	<CALnjE+odj6GdO97n4NBLQhP4egMzuNHMjxVqMwC7fSC5C=hT-g@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: daniele.di.proietto@gmail.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org
To: pshelar@nicira.com
Return-path: <netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([149.20.54.216]:56017 "EHLO
	shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1755545AbbAFWCI (ORCPT
	<rfc822;netdev@vger.kernel.org>); Tue, 6 Jan 2015 17:02:08 -0500
In-Reply-To: <CALnjE+odj6GdO97n4NBLQhP4egMzuNHMjxVqMwC7fSC5C=hT-g@mail.gmail.com>
Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <netdev.vger.kernel.org>

From: Pravin Shelar <pshelar@nicira.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2015 13:16:11 -0800

> Function return type and function name should be on same line,
> otherwise looks good.

I disagree, where is the code in the tree that needs this?