From: Thomas Graf <tgraf@suug.ch>
To: Ying Xue <ying.xue@windriver.com>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
jon.maloy@ericsson.com, Paul.Gortmaker@windriver.com,
erik.hugne@ericsson.com, tipc-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 5/5] tipc: convert tipc reference table to use generic rhashtable
Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2015 09:42:51 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150106094251.GE12468@casper.infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1420529003-22244-6-git-send-email-ying.xue@windriver.com>
On 01/06/15 at 03:23pm, Ying Xue wrote:
> As tipc reference table is statically allocated, its memory size
> requested on stack initialization stage is quite big even if the
> maximum port number is just restricted to 8191 currently, however,
> the number already becomes insufficient in practice. But if the
> maximum ports is allowed to its theory value - 2^32, its consumed
> memory size will reach a ridiculously unacceptable value. Apart from
> this, heavy tipc users spend a considerable amount of time in
> tipc_sk_get() due to the read-lock on ref_table_lock.
>
> If tipc reference table is converted with generic rhashtable, above
> mentioned both disadvantages would be resolved respectively: making
> use of the new resizable hash table can avoid locking on the lookup;
> smaller memory size is required at initial stage, for example, 256
> hash bucket slots are requested at the beginning phase instead of
> allocating the entire 8191 slots in old mode. The hash table will
> grow if entries exceeds 75% of table size up to a total table size
> of 1M, and it will automatically shrink if usage falls below 30%,
> but the minimum table size is allowed down to 256.
>
> Also converts ref_table_lock to a separate mutex to protect hash table
> mutations on write side. Lastly defers the release of the socket
> reference using call_rcu() to allow using an RCU read-side protected
> call to rhashtable_lookup().
>
> Signed-off-by: Ying Xue <ying.xue@windriver.com>
> Acked-by: Jon Maloy <jon.maloy@ericsson.com>
> Acked-by: Erik Hugne <erik.hugne@ericsson.com>
> Cc: Thomas Graf <tgraf@suug.ch>
The rhashtable usage looks good to me. I assume the TIPC maintainers
have reviewed the other pieces.
Acked-by: Thomas Graf <tgraf@suug.ch>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-01-06 9:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-01-06 7:23 [PATCH net-next 0/5] Involve rhashtable_lookup_insert routine Ying Xue
2015-01-06 7:23 ` [PATCH net-next 1/5] rhashtable: optimize rhashtable_lookup routine Ying Xue
2015-01-06 9:13 ` Thomas Graf
2015-01-06 7:23 ` [PATCH net-next 2/5] rhashtable: introduce rhashtable_wakeup_worker helper function Ying Xue
2015-01-06 9:29 ` Thomas Graf
2015-01-06 7:23 ` [PATCH net-next 3/5] rhashtable: use future table size to make expansion decision Ying Xue
2015-01-06 9:35 ` Thomas Graf
2015-01-06 9:56 ` Ying Xue
2015-01-06 10:06 ` Thomas Graf
2015-01-06 7:23 ` [PATCH net-next 4/5] rhashtable: involve rhashtable_lookup_insert routine Ying Xue
2015-01-06 9:41 ` Thomas Graf
2015-01-06 7:23 ` [PATCH net-next 5/5] tipc: convert tipc reference table to use generic rhashtable Ying Xue
2015-01-06 9:42 ` Thomas Graf [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150106094251.GE12468@casper.infradead.org \
--to=tgraf@suug.ch \
--cc=Paul.Gortmaker@windriver.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=erik.hugne@ericsson.com \
--cc=jon.maloy@ericsson.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tipc-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=ying.xue@windriver.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).