From: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com>
To: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>
Cc: Network Development <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next RFC 5/5] net-timestamp: tx timestamping default mode flag
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 09:26:14 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150112082612.GA5348@netboy> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+FuTSfDVbSCGfJDjY3kv=SuGT221OuYAFVxDvRqouNcrJbvYw@mail.gmail.com>
On Sun, Jan 11, 2015 at 08:49:00PM -0500, Willem de Bruijn wrote:
> Just so I understand: ptp has no use for the sw tstamps
> that would be generated with this flag, but is otherwise
> okay with enabling counters to order tx timestamps
> (OPT_ID) and disabling payload (OPT_TSONLY)?
Yes.
> In the documentation, I would like to strongly suggest all
> processes to enable these, even in absence of this default.
> because that is more robust wrt the sysctl (if merged).
Sounds good.
Thanks,
Richard
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-01-12 8:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-01-09 17:31 [PATCH net-next RFC 0/5] net-timestamp: address blinding and batching Willem de Bruijn
2015-01-09 17:31 ` [PATCH net-next RFC 1/5] net-timestamp: no-payload option Willem de Bruijn
2015-01-09 19:43 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-01-09 19:47 ` Willem de Bruijn
2015-01-09 20:02 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-01-09 20:33 ` Willem de Bruijn
2015-01-09 20:55 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-01-09 21:18 ` Willem de Bruijn
2015-01-09 22:00 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-01-11 20:26 ` Richard Cochran
2015-01-15 18:22 ` Willem de Bruijn
2015-01-09 17:31 ` [PATCH net-next RFC 2/5] net-timestamp: no-payload only sysctl Willem de Bruijn
2015-01-09 17:31 ` [PATCH net-next RFC 3/5] net-timestamp: no-payload option in txtimestamp test Willem de Bruijn
2015-01-09 17:31 ` [PATCH net-next RFC 4/5] net-timestamp: tx timestamp cookies Willem de Bruijn
2015-01-09 17:31 ` [PATCH net-next RFC 5/5] net-timestamp: tx timestamping default mode flag Willem de Bruijn
2015-01-11 20:32 ` Richard Cochran
2015-01-12 1:49 ` Willem de Bruijn
2015-01-12 8:26 ` Richard Cochran [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150112082612.GA5348@netboy \
--to=richardcochran@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=luto@amacapital.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=willemb@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).