* Why is bridge's sysfs values in 1/100 of second?
@ 2015-01-14 2:35 Ben Greear
2015-01-14 2:53 ` David Miller
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Ben Greear @ 2015-01-14 2:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: netdev
Are the units supposed to be 1/100 of a second, or is that just some
luck depending on HZ?
root@ath9k-138:/home/lanforge# brctl setageing br0 98
root@ath9k-138:/home/lanforge# cat /sys/class/net/br0/bridge/ageing_time
9800
Thanks,
Ben
--
Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: Why is bridge's sysfs values in 1/100 of second?
2015-01-14 2:35 Why is bridge's sysfs values in 1/100 of second? Ben Greear
@ 2015-01-14 2:53 ` David Miller
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: David Miller @ 2015-01-14 2:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: greearb; +Cc: netdev
From: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2015 18:35:06 -0800
> Are the units supposed to be 1/100 of a second, or is that just some
> luck depending on HZ?
More specifically, it's "USER_HZ" which unlike HZ is unchanging.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2015-01-14 2:58 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-01-14 2:35 Why is bridge's sysfs values in 1/100 of second? Ben Greear
2015-01-14 2:53 ` David Miller
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).