From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] atm: remove deprecated use of pci api
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2015 21:59:44 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <20150113.215944.1703977685948196746.davem@davemloft.net>
References: <20150112161042.GA11374@sloth>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: chas@cmf.nrl.navy.mil, linux-atm-general@lists.sourceforge.net,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
To: lambert.quentin@gmail.com
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <20150112161042.GA11374@sloth>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org

From: Quentin Lambert <lambert.quentin@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 17:10:42 +0100

> @@ -2246,7 +2246,8 @@ static int eni_init_one(struct pci_dev *pci_dev,
>  		goto err_disable;
>  
>  	zero = &eni_dev->zero;
> -	zero->addr = pci_alloc_consistent(pci_dev, ENI_ZEROES_SIZE, &zero->dma);
> +	zero->addr = dma_alloc_coherent(&pci_dev->dev, ENI_ZEROES_SIZE,
> +					&zero->dma, GFP_ATOMIC);
>  	if (!zero->addr)
>  		goto err_kfree;
>  

I really would like you to look at these locations and see if
GFP_KERNEL can be used instead of GFP_ATOMIC.  I bet that nearly
all of these can, and it is preferred.

Thanks.