From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 0/2] net: Remote checksum offload for VXLAN Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 15:21:29 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <20150114.152129.1086585159807498251.davem@davemloft.net> References: <1421110838-5146-1-git-send-email-therbert@google.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org To: therbert@google.com Return-path: Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([149.20.54.216]:45002 "EHLO shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751276AbbANUVc (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Jan 2015 15:21:32 -0500 In-Reply-To: <1421110838-5146-1-git-send-email-therbert@google.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: Tom Herbert Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 17:00:36 -0800 > This patch set adds support for remote checksum offload in VXLAN. > > The remote checksum offload is generalized by creating a common > function (remcsum_adjust) that does the work of modifying the > checksum in remote checksum offload. This function can be called > from normal or GRO path. GUE was modified to use this function. > > To support RCO is VXLAN we use the 9th bit in the reserved > flags to indicated remote checksum offload. The start and offset > values are encoded n a compressed form in the low order (reserved) > byte of the vni field. > > Remote checksum offload is described in > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-herbert-remotecsumoffload-01 Tom's arguments for why he separates RX and TX paths seem completely reasonable, and match my own understanding of the various tunneling technologies we support. Therefore, series applied, thanks!