From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: chas williams - CONTRACTOR Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] atm: remove deprecated use of pci api Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 08:58:51 -0500 Message-ID: <20150114085851.234db50d@thirdoffive.cmf.nrl.navy.mil> References: <20150112161042.GA11374@sloth> <20150113.215944.1703977685948196746.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: lambert.quentin@gmail.com, linux-atm-general@lists.sourceforge.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org To: David Miller Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20150113.215944.1703977685948196746.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Tue, 13 Jan 2015 21:59:44 -0500 (EST) David Miller wrote: > From: Quentin Lambert > Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 17:10:42 +0100 > > > @@ -2246,7 +2246,8 @@ static int eni_init_one(struct pci_dev *pci_dev, > > goto err_disable; > > > > zero = &eni_dev->zero; > > - zero->addr = pci_alloc_consistent(pci_dev, ENI_ZEROES_SIZE, &zero->dma); > > + zero->addr = dma_alloc_coherent(&pci_dev->dev, ENI_ZEROES_SIZE, > > + &zero->dma, GFP_ATOMIC); > > if (!zero->addr) > > goto err_kfree; > > > > I really would like you to look at these locations and see if > GFP_KERNEL can be used instead of GFP_ATOMIC. I bet that nearly > all of these can, and it is preferred. > > Thanks. I think I would like to go through and just fix all the usages of the older pci interface. This patch isn't very complete due to its automated nature. I will make some time this weekend.