From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [patch-net-next v2 3/3] net: ethernet: cpsw: don't requests IRQs we don't use Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2015 23:36:42 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <20150115.233642.1752634915667200562.davem@davemloft.net> References: <20150115152053.GA16409@saruman> <20150115.181615.498992970722065060.davem@davemloft.net> <20150116012852.GA3115@saruman> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: mugunthanvnm@ti.com, tony@atomide.com, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: balbi@ti.com Return-path: Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([149.20.54.216]:57141 "EHLO shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751253AbbAPEgr (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Jan 2015 23:36:47 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20150116012852.GA3115@saruman> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: Felipe Balbi Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2015 19:28:52 -0600 > On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 06:16:15PM -0500, David Miller wrote: >> Indeed, I agree that adding something as a placeholder that just gets >> immediately removed should be avoided unless it is extremely difficult >> to do so. > > what does this mean ? you prefer both patches to be combined ? Yes, something like that.