From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/3] openvswitch: Add STT support.
Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2015 01:00:08 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <20150123.010008.319675287744637375.davem@davemloft.net>
References: <CAEP_g=_B5xTcfONUP4PTw91PdJKx_cN_+Qdd4F6300aXVyzLZg@mail.gmail.com>
	<54C03A57.4080002@6wind.com>
	<CA+mtBx9pnkJBVftqFTK6fcd-toAxsJrvB=drTxWQs_=5s9C0+A@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: vincent.jardin@6wind.com, jesse@nicira.com, pshelar@nicira.com,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org
To: therbert@google.com
Return-path: <netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([149.20.54.216]:46226 "EHLO
	shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1752850AbbAWJAJ (ORCPT
	<rfc822;netdev@vger.kernel.org>); Fri, 23 Jan 2015 04:00:09 -0500
In-Reply-To: <CA+mtBx9pnkJBVftqFTK6fcd-toAxsJrvB=drTxWQs_=5s9C0+A@mail.gmail.com>
Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <netdev.vger.kernel.org>

From: Tom Herbert <therbert@google.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2015 08:24:15 -0800

> STT is undoubtedly a creative and unique solution I'll give you that,
> but the potential repercussions of allowing this to be widely deployed
> are profound. IMO this needs to be fully explored before it can ever
> be allowed in the kernel. If there has already been discussion on this
> please forward a pointer (I didn't find anything in the IETF mailing
> list archives other than the draft posting announcements), but at the
> minimum these patches warrant a lot of scrutiny.

+1