From: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
To: Oleg <lego12239@yandex.ru>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: CONFIG_NF_CONNTRACK_PROCFS
Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2015 12:22:09 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150125112209.GD13167@breakpoint.cc> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150125055117.GA5586@localhost>
Oleg <lego12239@yandex.ru> wrote:
> net/netfilter/nf_conntrack procfs file is marked as obsolete in the recent
> kernels. What's wrong with it? Or it's simply a new fashion to replace
> simple file interface with anything else?
proc has several drawbacks vs. ctnetlink:
- not extensible
- doesn't have ability to query for particular items
- no add/delete support
- no event notification (e.g. conntrack -E)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-01-25 11:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-01-25 5:51 CONFIG_NF_CONNTRACK_PROCFS Oleg
2015-01-25 11:22 ` Florian Westphal [this message]
2015-01-25 19:44 ` CONFIG_NF_CONNTRACK_PROCFS Oleg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150125112209.GD13167@breakpoint.cc \
--to=fw@strlen.de \
--cc=lego12239@yandex.ru \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).