From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers: net: xgene: fix: Out of order descriptor bytes read Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 14:34:02 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <20150126.143402.1309886104452878553.davem@davemloft.net> References: <1421957007-720-1-git-send-email-isubramanian@apm.com> <1421967050.3471.14.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: eric.dumazet@gmail.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, mlangsdo@redhat.com, patches@apm.com, kchudgar@apm.com To: isubramanian@apm.com Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org From: Iyappan Subramanian Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 13:12:23 -0800 >>> @@ -369,6 +369,8 @@ static int xgene_enet_process_ring(struct xgene_enet_desc_ring *ring, >>> if (unlikely(xgene_enet_is_desc_slot_empty(raw_desc))) >>> break; >>> >>> + /* read fpqnum field after dataaddr field */ >>> + smp_rmb(); >>> if (is_rx_desc(raw_desc)) >>> ret = xgene_enet_rx_frame(ring, raw_desc); >>> else >> >> Reading your changelog, it looks like you need a plain rmb() here. > > rmb() translates into dsb, which in arm64 serializes everything > including instructions and thus expensive compared to dmb. > > Do you see any issue with smp_rmb() (which translates into dmb) ? smp_rmb() is not appropriate. You're not serializing accesses between two cpus, you're serializing the cpu with the device.