public inbox for netdev@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jack Morgenstein <jackm@dev.mellanox.co.il>
To: David Laight <David.Laight@ACULAB.COM>
Cc: 'Amir Vadai' <amirv@mellanox.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Or Gerlitz" <ogerlitz@mellanox.com>,
	Yevgeny Petrilin <yevgenyp@mellanox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 06/10] net/mlx4_core: Fix struct mlx4_vhcr_cmd to make implicit padding explicit
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2015 16:43:02 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150127164302.2b2cc3e0@jpm-OptiPlex-GX620> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <063D6719AE5E284EB5DD2968C1650D6D1CAD3D71@AcuExch.aculab.com>

On Tue, 27 Jan 2015 13:38:28 +0000
David Laight <David.Laight@ACULAB.COM> wrote:

> Haven't you broken communication between an old and new
> 32bit Guests and 32bit hosts (assuming they exist)?

Yes, but I don't see any interest on the net in running 32-bit Hosts
with virtualization and SR IOV.  I do see that there is interest in
running 32-bit Guests over 64-bit Hosts (which configuration KVM
supports).

Since this change is *required* for supporting 32-bit Guests on 64-bit
Hosts, I don't see that we have much choice here.

As you say, an old 32-bit Host will not be compatible with a new 32-bit
guest, and vice-versa. However, I would assume that almost all Hosts
would have 64-bit architectures, because of the performance and
memory-space requirements for running SRIOV and virtualization.
Therefore, I don't see this as a stopper.

-Jack

  reply	other threads:[~2015-01-27 14:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-01-27  9:32 [PATCH net-next 00/10] Mellanox ethernet driver updates Jan-27-2015 Amir Vadai
2015-01-27  9:32 ` [PATCH net-next 01/10] net/mlx4_core: Add bad-cable event support Amir Vadai
2015-01-27  9:32 ` [PATCH net-next 02/10] net/mlx4_core: Add reserved lkey for VFs to QUERY_FUNC_CAP Amir Vadai
2015-01-27  9:32 ` [PATCH net-next 03/10] net/mlx4_core: Fix mem leak in SRIOV mlx4_init_one error flow Amir Vadai
2015-01-27  9:32 ` [PATCH net-next 04/10] net/mlx4_core: Adjust command timeouts to conform to the firmware spec Amir Vadai
2015-01-27  9:32 ` [PATCH net-next 05/10] net/mlx4_core: Fix HW2SW_EQ " Amir Vadai
2015-01-27  9:32 ` [PATCH net-next 06/10] net/mlx4_core: Fix struct mlx4_vhcr_cmd to make implicit padding explicit Amir Vadai
2015-01-27  9:43   ` David Laight
2015-01-27 13:00     ` Jack Morgenstein
2015-01-27 13:38       ` David Laight
2015-01-27 14:43         ` Jack Morgenstein [this message]
2015-01-27 19:13     ` David Miller
2015-01-27 19:50       ` Jack Morgenstein
2015-01-28 15:16       ` Jack Morgenstein
2015-01-27  9:32 ` [PATCH net-next 07/10] net/mlx4_core: Remove duplicate code line from procedure mlx4_bf_alloc Amir Vadai
2015-01-27  9:32 ` [PATCH net-next 08/10] net/mlx4_en: Use ethtool cmd->autoneg as a hint for ethtool set settings Amir Vadai
2015-01-27  9:32 ` [PATCH net-next 09/10] net/mlx4: Fix memory corruption in mlx4_MAD_IFC_wrapper Amir Vadai
2015-01-27  9:32 ` [PATCH net-next 10/10] net/mlx4_core: Fix device capabilities dumping Amir Vadai

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150127164302.2b2cc3e0@jpm-OptiPlex-GX620 \
    --to=jackm@dev.mellanox.co.il \
    --cc=David.Laight@ACULAB.COM \
    --cc=amirv@mellanox.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ogerlitz@mellanox.com \
    --cc=yevgenyp@mellanox.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox