From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Graf Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] rhashtable: Use a single bucket lock for sibling buckets Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2015 12:50:10 +0000 Message-ID: <20150131125010.GA29169@casper.infradead.org> References: <14d537500868b4ff0396168cf9d5db95d327c128.1422576760.git.tgraf@suug.ch> <20150131043436.GA27564@gondor.apana.org.au> <20150131084127.GA13841@casper.infradead.org> <20150131093812.GA29240@gondor.apana.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, ying.xue@windriver.com To: Herbert Xu Return-path: Received: from casper.infradead.org ([85.118.1.10]:42122 "EHLO casper.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751002AbbAaMuO (ORCPT ); Sat, 31 Jan 2015 07:50:14 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150131093812.GA29240@gondor.apana.org.au> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 01/31/15 at 08:38pm, Herbert Xu wrote: > On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 08:41:27AM +0000, Thomas Graf wrote: > > On 01/31/15 at 03:34pm, Herbert Xu wrote: > > > Thomas, could you please hold off on these changes? They totally > > > conflict with my rehash work, which is going to render these changes > > > moot anyway since it'll completely change how expansion/shrinking > > > works. > > > > Can you share that work? > > I will post it when it's ready. But if you keep moving the goal > posts then I'll never get there. My intent is definitely not to make it harder for you. My intent is fix the remaining races which were reported before net-next gets merged. I'm happy to hold off if you plan on proposing your rehashing in the current net-next cycle.