From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Graf Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] [RFC: add openvswitch actions using BPF 2/9] odp: add a new ODP action: OVS_ACTION_ATTR_BPF_PROG Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2015 15:11:43 +0100 Message-ID: <20150205141143.GC5546@pox.localdomain> References: <1423090163-19902-1-git-send-email-azhou@nicira.com> <1423090163-19902-3-git-send-email-azhou@nicira.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: dev@openvswitch.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: Andy Zhou Return-path: Received: from mail-we0-f178.google.com ([74.125.82.178]:38033 "EHLO mail-we0-f178.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757432AbbBEOLq (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Feb 2015 09:11:46 -0500 Received: by mail-we0-f178.google.com with SMTP id k48so7869487wev.9 for ; Thu, 05 Feb 2015 06:11:45 -0800 (PST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1423090163-19902-3-git-send-email-azhou@nicira.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 02/04/15 at 02:49pm, Andy Zhou wrote: > +struct ovs_action_bpf_prog { > + __be32 prog_fd; > + __be32 arg0; > + __be32 arg1; > +}; Given the 64 bit registers of BPF. Should we have all args in the Netlink message be 64 bit as well?