From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Graf Subject: Re: [RFC net-next 3/4] openvswitch: Add conntrack action. Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2015 19:13:56 +0000 Message-ID: <20150215191356.GA14888@casper.infradead.org> References: <1423901633-53789-1-git-send-email-joestringer@nicira.com> <1423901633-53789-4-git-send-email-joestringer@nicira.com> <20150214195607.GA30752@casper.infradead.org> <54E0B67A.1030000@6wind.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com, Linux Netdev List , Justin Pettit , Pablo Neira Ayuso , "dev@openvswitch.org" To: Joe Stringer Return-path: Received: from casper.infradead.org ([85.118.1.10]:46293 "EHLO casper.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754699AbbBOTOB (ORCPT ); Sun, 15 Feb 2015 14:14:01 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 02/15/15 at 11:06am, Joe Stringer wrote: > On 15 February 2015 at 07:08, Nicolas Dichtel wrote: > > Le 15/02/2015 05:47, Joe Stringer a =E9crit : > >> Right, it was more of a general sanity check which is likely unnee= ded. > >> I'm not aware of any particular case that this handles. > > > > I agree with Thomas. If we fall into this case, it's probably a rea= l bug ;-) >=20 > We can BUG_ON(), then. Let's do a WARN() and just error so we keep the kernel running ;-)