From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] vhost: support upto 509 memory regions
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 13:32:12 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150217123212.GA6362@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <54E31F24.1060705@redhat.com>
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 11:59:48AM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
>
> On 17/02/2015 10:02, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > Increasing VHOST_MEMORY_MAX_NREGIONS from 65 to 509
> > > to match KVM_USER_MEM_SLOTS fixes issue for vhost-net.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
> >
> > This scares me a bit: each region is 32byte, we are talking
> > a 16K allocation that userspace can trigger.
>
> What's bad with a 16K allocation?
It fails when memory is fragmented.
> > How does kvm handle this issue?
>
> It doesn't.
>
> Paolo
I'm guessing kvm doesn't do memory scans on data path,
vhost does.
qemu is just doing things that kernel didn't expect it to need.
Instead, I suggest reducing number of GPA<->HVA mappings:
you have GPA 1,5,7
map them at HVA 11,15,17
then you can have 1 slot: 1->11
To avoid libc reusing the memory holes, reserve them with MAP_NORESERVE
or something like this.
We can discuss smarter lookup algorithms but I'd rather
userspace didn't do things that we then have to
work around in kernel.
--
MST
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-02-17 12:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-02-13 15:49 [PATCH] vhost: support upto 509 memory regions Igor Mammedov
2015-02-17 9:02 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2015-02-17 10:59 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-02-17 12:32 ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2015-02-17 13:11 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-02-17 13:29 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2015-02-17 14:11 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-02-17 15:02 ` Igor Mammedov
2015-02-17 17:09 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-02-17 14:44 ` Igor Mammedov
2015-02-17 14:45 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-02-18 0:53 ` Eric Northup
2015-02-18 4:27 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2015-05-18 16:22 ` Andrey Korolyov
2015-05-18 16:28 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2015-05-19 11:50 ` Igor Mammedov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150217123212.GA6362@redhat.com \
--to=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=imammedo@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).